Récemment, vans cuir femme quand j'ai vu les résultats d'un sondage affiché en ligne, j'ai été surpris parce qu'un grand pourcentage d'électeurs, hommes et femmes, avaient voté pour les chaussures de marque comme l'accessoire le plus important qu'ils devaient posséder. En bref, sans ces chaussures de marque, vans era 59 votre garde-robe est incomplète. Il y a un autre point de vue à cela. Lorsque nous achetons des vêtements, la chaussure devient un accessoire important que la plupart d'entre nous peuvent se permettre. Peut-être que c'est une autre raison de la popularité des chaussures de marque. En arrivant à DC chaussures à nouveau, nous pouvons voir qu'ils sont modélisés en autant de variétés de nos jours et presque tous les modèles ont été affichés en ligne dans différentes galeries de chaussures.
Voyons vans era noir voir pourquoi les chaussures de vans sont si célèbres? (1) Les chaussures de Vans sont dites être pour des personnes de tous les genres et de tous les goûts. vans cuir blanc En outre, ils sont utiles pour de nombreux types d'occasions. (2) Vans valent vraiment le coût et aujourd'hui en raison de la concurrence croissante entre les vendeurs en ligne de chaussures, vous obtenez des tarifs vraiment compétitifs. (3) En plus d'être élégants, ils sont incroyablement confortables ils font aussi de superbes chaussures de marche. Vous n'avez pas besoin d'acheter une autre paire pour marcher! (4) Étant une vieille compagnie fonctionnant maintenant depuis vingt ans, vous pouvez faire confiance à l'entreprise et acheter sans hésitation. (5) Principalement étant des chaussures à fond plat, vous pouvez les utiliser pour courir, sauter, patiner ou faire du vélo! (6) Avec les camionnettes, vous pouvez obtenir vos chaussures sur mesure. C'est une autre bonne chose à propos de ces chaussures. Spécifiez vos besoins et transmettez également les détails de conception si vous le pouvez. Ils feront des chaussures parfaites pour vous! (7) Littéralement des milliers de modèles et de modèles sont disponibles dans des chaussures à choisir parmi différentes galeries en ligne.
Il est dit vans era pro que si vous vivez sur l'adrénaline, vous devez savoir sur les chaussures de vans; Telle est la relation étroite entre les chaussures de camionnettes et les événements sportifs. Ils méritent définitivement la réputation contrairement à certaines marques moins chères disponibles. Vous pouvez être sûr du confort, de la durabilité et de la force de vos chaussures et les utiliser au maximum. En outre, aujourd'hui, en raison de nombreux sites de vente en ligne de chaussures, vous les obtenez à des tarifs abordables avec des rabais énormes. Assurez-vous qu'il est le bon site pour que vous obteniez des chaussures authentiques. Aussi, il est préférable si vous pouvez voir des chaussures d'autres grandes marques comme les chaussures DC ou converser avec des chaussures Vans là-bas. Cela vous aide à comparer deux variétés et à finaliser ce qui vous convient! Livraison à votre place n'est généralement pas un problème. Mais changer plus tard pourrait être. Donc, il vaut mieux que vous puissiez conclure une affaire après avoir soigneusement examiné toutes les options. Après tout, les chaussures font l'inclusion de garde-robe nécessaire pour vous!
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-vans-cuir-femme
Wednesday, December 20, 2017
adidas nmd runner damen
Erstens, adidas nmd r1 damen vor allem um Sport. Adidas ist bekannt als der Sportverband "Sportgenie". Als Sportartikel-Unternehmen, Adidas und das Schicksal des Sports kann als vernünftig beschrieben werden, Adidas Herausforderung der Grenzen der Markenpersönlichkeit und Sport-Geist hat eine interne Passform. adidas nmd r1 herren Zweitens, um "Kreativität und Interaktion", um Markenverjüngung zu erreichen. Outdoor-Medien ist Adidas unverzichtbarer Bestandteil des Medienportfolios. Drittens, mit der ursprünglichen Marke Differenzierung zu erreichen Durchbruch. Originalität ist Adidas glorreiche Vergangenheit und lange Geschichte der Sportproduktproduktion. Ähnlich, in der Adidas Branding Prozess der Individualität in der gleichen Original-und kostbare. Viertens, mit dem "großzügigen", um maximale Effizienz der Kommunikation zu erreichen. Machen Sie nicht die üblichen mittelmäßigen Outdoor-Werbung, verlassen Sie die Pfeife der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit Routinen, aber nicht tun, Low-Level-Promotion-Aktivitäten, um einen mutigen Durchbruch zu tun, ist es notwendig, anders zu sein, müssen wir Public Relations, Werbung und Promotion-Marketing zu erreichen Mittel der hohen Docking- und Integrationseffekte.
Kaufen adidas nmd runner damen Sie Sportschuhe, dann werden viele Leute Adidas, Nike, wie die international renommierte Sportmarke wählen, zusätzlich zu diesen Marken Ruhm, mit einem Gefühl von High, die Spitze ihrer vielen Top-Schuhe-Technologie ist auch attraktiv für die wichtigsten Faktoren. Adidas, zum Beispiel Adidas Schuhe Wissenschaft und Technologie weiterhin neue vorstellen, wurden sie als "Sport-Technologie" für die Marke Entwicklung der ursprünglichen Macht und grundlegende, für alle, um eine Welle von ausgezeichneten High-Tech-Schuhe Produkte zu schaffen. In diesem, Klebeband mit jedem zu verstehen, was Adidas Schuhe Technologie.
Als einer adidas nmd runner rosa der Pioniere der Weltsportmarke steht Adidas immer im Vordergrund dieser Branche, die eng mit ihrem Hightech verwandt ist. Wir alle wissen, dass oft ein gutes Sportsport-Wissenschafts- und Technologieinhalt für eine große Teil von Adidas jedes Mal, wenn neue Stiefel werden vor allem einige wichtige Technologie, die Adidas wurde die Ursache der Sorge gestartet werden. Adidas-Technologie viel, gibt es TORSION SYSTEM Reverse-System (Außensohlen-Technologie), adiDRENE (am Ende der Technik), adiDRY, TRAXION ungerade Nagel-Technologie, PREDATOR Falcon-Technologie, etc., heute Xiaobian, um die nächste Adidas Traxion dies hat Superior Auf dem Boden der High-Tech.
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-nmd-runner-damen
Kaufen adidas nmd runner damen Sie Sportschuhe, dann werden viele Leute Adidas, Nike, wie die international renommierte Sportmarke wählen, zusätzlich zu diesen Marken Ruhm, mit einem Gefühl von High, die Spitze ihrer vielen Top-Schuhe-Technologie ist auch attraktiv für die wichtigsten Faktoren. Adidas, zum Beispiel Adidas Schuhe Wissenschaft und Technologie weiterhin neue vorstellen, wurden sie als "Sport-Technologie" für die Marke Entwicklung der ursprünglichen Macht und grundlegende, für alle, um eine Welle von ausgezeichneten High-Tech-Schuhe Produkte zu schaffen. In diesem, Klebeband mit jedem zu verstehen, was Adidas Schuhe Technologie.
Als einer adidas nmd runner rosa der Pioniere der Weltsportmarke steht Adidas immer im Vordergrund dieser Branche, die eng mit ihrem Hightech verwandt ist. Wir alle wissen, dass oft ein gutes Sportsport-Wissenschafts- und Technologieinhalt für eine große Teil von Adidas jedes Mal, wenn neue Stiefel werden vor allem einige wichtige Technologie, die Adidas wurde die Ursache der Sorge gestartet werden. Adidas-Technologie viel, gibt es TORSION SYSTEM Reverse-System (Außensohlen-Technologie), adiDRENE (am Ende der Technik), adiDRY, TRAXION ungerade Nagel-Technologie, PREDATOR Falcon-Technologie, etc., heute Xiaobian, um die nächste Adidas Traxion dies hat Superior Auf dem Boden der High-Tech.
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-nmd-runner-damen
adidas nmd runner womens
Besides adidas nmd r1 uk like a fitness writer, Tarima has also recently been an aerobics trainer for a long time. Knowing the importance from the sports apparels and workouts shoes for efficient workout sessions, she uses his long experience to use picking up the accurately designed aerobics shoes. adidas nmd r1 black She personally believes that will good sports footwear contribute a good deal in keeping the perfect balance for fitness. Although this is present elsewhere in a couple of running shoes, much belonging to the Adidas forMOTION technology is targeted on the heel portion belonging to the shoe. It features its own material that divides the heel part of the shoe into a couple of distinct sections. The material between these people allows the lower plate-like outsole to allow for the upper midsole closer towards the feet to slide and make progress as the shoe has effects on the ground. This is supposed to absorb impact while carrying your foot right much smoother strike. Adidas claims that this result mimics the natural motion belonging to the foot as close as you can.
This adidas nmd runner womens technology guides the foot through a midsole system that comes with two different molded factors. The two materials offer different type of properties that affect how the shoe reacts to every foot strike. The adiPRENE is a shock absorbing element found about the heel of the shoe as well as adiPRENE+ allows the forefoot in order to bounce and propel itself forward. Combining these two materials on different parts of the shoes make every single Adidas shoe quite useful in reducing impact and releasing energy to launch the runner forwards. CLIMACOOL will be Adidas version of breathable technology. A lot of different materials fall under the CLIMACOOL technology patio umbrella. They all allow the ventilation belonging to the foot from all aspects of the running shoe therefore, making them cool as well as comfortable.
NOSEAM adidas nmd runner pink The NOSEAM technological innovation in Adidas is a healthier way it sounds. The jogging shoes lack any seams. The outcomes is a nice stretched that fit that under no circumstances produces chaffing or irritation. Adidas has done a great job on this and durability just isn't affected by the deficiency of seams. TORSION SYSTEM Similar to numerous other technologies present while in the other running shoe brands, the Adidas Torsion Process allows the forefoot to move independently from the high heel. This allows the shoes to offer in the natural twisting movement belonging to the foot during the gait cycle. The result is superior stability and support.
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-nmd-runner-womens
This adidas nmd runner womens technology guides the foot through a midsole system that comes with two different molded factors. The two materials offer different type of properties that affect how the shoe reacts to every foot strike. The adiPRENE is a shock absorbing element found about the heel of the shoe as well as adiPRENE+ allows the forefoot in order to bounce and propel itself forward. Combining these two materials on different parts of the shoes make every single Adidas shoe quite useful in reducing impact and releasing energy to launch the runner forwards. CLIMACOOL will be Adidas version of breathable technology. A lot of different materials fall under the CLIMACOOL technology patio umbrella. They all allow the ventilation belonging to the foot from all aspects of the running shoe therefore, making them cool as well as comfortable.
NOSEAM adidas nmd runner pink The NOSEAM technological innovation in Adidas is a healthier way it sounds. The jogging shoes lack any seams. The outcomes is a nice stretched that fit that under no circumstances produces chaffing or irritation. Adidas has done a great job on this and durability just isn't affected by the deficiency of seams. TORSION SYSTEM Similar to numerous other technologies present while in the other running shoe brands, the Adidas Torsion Process allows the forefoot to move independently from the high heel. This allows the shoes to offer in the natural twisting movement belonging to the foot during the gait cycle. The result is superior stability and support.
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-nmd-runner-womens
Monday, December 4, 2017
bugliosi 53 pieces of evidence number 3
3. When Oswald told Wesley Frazier why he was coming to Irving on a Thursday night—to pick up curtain rods—Frazier said to Oswald, “Oh, very well,” then added, “Well, will you be going home with me tomorrow also?” and Oswald replied, “No.”
so whats missing here ? bugliosi surely read his star witness (marina oswald ) testimony ? of course he did , so then he knew exactly what she said about this matter ,so why does he omit to mention what she said ? .
Mr. RANKIN. When he said he would not be home that Friday evening, did you ask him why?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes.
Mr. RANKIN. What did he say?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that since he was home on Thursday, that it wouldn't make any sense to come again on Friday, that he would come for the weekend.
Mr. RANKIN. Did that cause you to think that he had any special plans to do anything?
Mrs. OSWALD. No.
so bugliosi knew from his star witness marina that oswald said he wouldnt be coming back out to irving on friday evening as he had stayed thursday night , but that he would instead COME BACK OVER THE WEEKEND .
so buglosi used his prosection brief to assert that oswald was not going to irving on friday because he had other plans (shoot jfk) and because he knew he would never return there . when in fact bugliosi knew that marina had testified that oswald told her he would not be back on friday because as he had stayed thursday that it didnt make sense , so he instead was coming back at the weekend .
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-3
so whats missing here ? bugliosi surely read his star witness (marina oswald ) testimony ? of course he did , so then he knew exactly what she said about this matter ,so why does he omit to mention what she said ? .
Mr. RANKIN. When he said he would not be home that Friday evening, did you ask him why?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes.
Mr. RANKIN. What did he say?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that since he was home on Thursday, that it wouldn't make any sense to come again on Friday, that he would come for the weekend.
Mr. RANKIN. Did that cause you to think that he had any special plans to do anything?
Mrs. OSWALD. No.
so bugliosi knew from his star witness marina that oswald said he wouldnt be coming back out to irving on friday evening as he had stayed thursday night , but that he would instead COME BACK OVER THE WEEKEND .
so buglosi used his prosection brief to assert that oswald was not going to irving on friday because he had other plans (shoot jfk) and because he knew he would never return there . when in fact bugliosi knew that marina had testified that oswald told her he would not be back on friday because as he had stayed thursday that it didnt make sense , so he instead was coming back at the weekend .
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-3
bugliosi 53 pieces of evidence number 1
1. Whenever Oswald had Wesley Frazier drive him out to visit his wife and daughters at the Paine residence in Irving, he’d go on a Friday evening and return to Dallas on Monday morning. The assassination was on Friday, November 22, 1963. For the very first time, Oswald went to Irving with Frazier on Thursday evening, November 21, obviously to pick up his Mannlicher-Carcano rifle for the following day.
bugliosi states that whenever THAT IS EVERY TIME he went to irving that he went on a friday evening and that he only deviated from that ROUTINE one time NOVEMBER 21 1963 . firstly oswald only worked in the depository about 6 weeks , it wasnt a period of months or years JUST A FEW WEEKS .
secondly oswald did deviate from that routine . he did so on a public holliday , i stand to be corrected on this (as i am not amercan) but i think it may have been veterans day .. he deviated the week before the assassination when he did not go to irving AT ALL .
and he did so again atleast a third time in those 6 weeks
Mr. RANKIN. Now, the weekend of October 25th to the 27th, did your husband return to Irving that weekend?
Mrs. OSWALD. There were some weekends when he did not come. But this was at my request. It happened twice, I think. One such weekend was the occasion of the birthday of Mrs. Paine's daughter. And I knew that Lee didn't like Michael, Mrs. Paine's husband, and I asked him not to come.
This was one occasion.
The other I don't recall. I don't recall the date of this. But I remember that the weekend before he shot at the President, he did not come on Saturday and Sunday. Because we had a quarrel--that incident with the fictitious name.
No, I am confused.
It would be easier for me to remember if I knew the birthday of that girl. Perhaps you know. Perhaps you have it noted down somewhere.
Mrs. OSWALD. I remember that there was one weekend when he didn't come on a Friday, but said that he would come on a Saturday. And he said that that was because he wanted to visit another place supposedly there was another job open, more interesting work.
Mr. RANKIN. Did he say where this other job was that he thought was more interesting?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that this was also based upon an ad in a newspaper, and that it was connected--that it was related to photography. And he went there in the morning and then--on a Saturday--and then came to us, still during the morning.
Mr. RANKIN. He came home, then, on Saturday, some time before noon of that day?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes, before noon.
It seems to me that there was a holiday on that day, on the 8th elections--were there elections on that day?
Mr. RANKIN. Are you thinking of November 11th, Veterans Day?
so on atleast 3 occassions that we know of oswald did not go to irving as normal or broke his so called routine .
1/ the paines daughters birthday 25 to 27 oct oswald did not go to irving at marinas request
2/ veterans day
3/ november 15 didnt go to irving at all
so bugliosi maintaned that oswald had a routine that he only broke once , when in fact he did so one way or another on atleast 3 out of the 6 weeks .
so its clear that bugliosi sought to assert that oswald had a pretty rigid routine that he only broke one time , anything to make oswald look guilty . this we find according to bugliosis own star witness is not accurate . well he was a prosecutor so he offers only a prosecution brief .
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-1
bugliosi states that whenever THAT IS EVERY TIME he went to irving that he went on a friday evening and that he only deviated from that ROUTINE one time NOVEMBER 21 1963 . firstly oswald only worked in the depository about 6 weeks , it wasnt a period of months or years JUST A FEW WEEKS .
secondly oswald did deviate from that routine . he did so on a public holliday , i stand to be corrected on this (as i am not amercan) but i think it may have been veterans day .. he deviated the week before the assassination when he did not go to irving AT ALL .
and he did so again atleast a third time in those 6 weeks
Mr. RANKIN. Now, the weekend of October 25th to the 27th, did your husband return to Irving that weekend?
Mrs. OSWALD. There were some weekends when he did not come. But this was at my request. It happened twice, I think. One such weekend was the occasion of the birthday of Mrs. Paine's daughter. And I knew that Lee didn't like Michael, Mrs. Paine's husband, and I asked him not to come.
This was one occasion.
The other I don't recall. I don't recall the date of this. But I remember that the weekend before he shot at the President, he did not come on Saturday and Sunday. Because we had a quarrel--that incident with the fictitious name.
No, I am confused.
It would be easier for me to remember if I knew the birthday of that girl. Perhaps you know. Perhaps you have it noted down somewhere.
Mrs. OSWALD. I remember that there was one weekend when he didn't come on a Friday, but said that he would come on a Saturday. And he said that that was because he wanted to visit another place supposedly there was another job open, more interesting work.
Mr. RANKIN. Did he say where this other job was that he thought was more interesting?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that this was also based upon an ad in a newspaper, and that it was connected--that it was related to photography. And he went there in the morning and then--on a Saturday--and then came to us, still during the morning.
Mr. RANKIN. He came home, then, on Saturday, some time before noon of that day?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes, before noon.
It seems to me that there was a holiday on that day, on the 8th elections--were there elections on that day?
Mr. RANKIN. Are you thinking of November 11th, Veterans Day?
so on atleast 3 occassions that we know of oswald did not go to irving as normal or broke his so called routine .
1/ the paines daughters birthday 25 to 27 oct oswald did not go to irving at marinas request
2/ veterans day
3/ november 15 didnt go to irving at all
so bugliosi maintaned that oswald had a routine that he only broke once , when in fact he did so one way or another on atleast 3 out of the 6 weeks .
so its clear that bugliosi sought to assert that oswald had a pretty rigid routine that he only broke one time , anything to make oswald look guilty . this we find according to bugliosis own star witness is not accurate . well he was a prosecutor so he offers only a prosecution brief .
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-1
Sunday, November 26, 2017
bugliosi 53 pieces of evidence (number 8 refuted )
8. When Frazier and Oswald arrived in the parking lot for the Book Depository Building on the morning of the assassination, Oswald picked up the long package on the backseat and, for the first time ever, walked quickly ahead of Frazier all the way into the building, Oswald being approximately fifty feet ahead at the time he entered the building. Always previously, they had walked the three hundred or so yards from the car to the building together.
when i look at a researcher be they bugliosi or myers or researcher on a forum like this i judge the content they post and claims they make on the level and years of research that they have . bugliosi had 22 years of research for his book , so there is zero excuse for him , if he claims that a piece of evidence proves that oswald was guilty i expect PROOF of that . i know from studying his work what he has researched and what he had access to , i mean in terms of documents and statements and testimony etc , and to be fair he had access to everything available whether he used it all or not .
so number 8 above , lets break it down , bugliosi is saying that upon arriving at the depository and parking up that oswald jumped out of wes fraziers car , grabbed a long package and took off about as fast as his little legs could carry him , leaving wes behind . so is this true and accurate ? well according to wes fraziers testimony its neither true or accurate . lets see .
Joseph Ball: What did he do about the package in the back seat when he got out of the car?Buell Wesley Frazier: Like I say, I was watching the gages and watched the car for a few minutes before I cut it off.Joseph Ball: Yes.Buell Wesley Frazier: He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you know, and so he walked down behind the car and standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me to get out of the car, and so quick as I cut the engine off and started out of the car, shut the door just as I was starting out just like getting out of the car, he started walking off and so I followed him in.
lets set the scene here . frazier upon arriving at the depository was a few minutes early . so he decided to sit in his car and let the engine run to charge the battery , my own opinion is that that is a bit strange given that the car had driven in from irving . so i really dont see how he could think sitting there for a minute or two with the engine running would charge the battery all that much more . but he also said that when early that he liked to watch the trains in the railyard . so being a few minutes early frazier sat in his car .
he notices that oswald is STILL THERE WAITING FOR HIM , yes thats right frazier said OSWALD WAS WAITING FOR HIM
"standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me " , but wait didnt bugliosi say oswald grabbed his package and walked quicky ahead of frazier ? in fact he did .
"Oswald picked up the long package on the backseat and, for the first time ever, walked quickly ahead of Frazier"
bugliosis number 8 is not a complete lie but he worded it deceptively and omitted vital information , information we know for a fact that he had . he had fraziers testimony as he cited and quoted from it , so he knew that frazier said OSWALD WAITED FOR HIM , in fact he mentioned that in his earlier book . YET HE OMITS THIS VITAL INFORMATION in his numebr 8 in reclaiming history .
WHY ? , well very clearly his 53 so called pieces of evidence was designed with the intent to state that they are all highly suspicious or make oswald look highly guilty . so if he admitted that oswald STOOD THERE WAITING FOR FRAZIER it would make it difficult for bugiosi to make oswald look guilty by russing away , so he omitted that important information .
he also uses the word QUICKLY as a means to emphasize that oswald was in a hurry to get away from frazier , because he had a rifle and wanted to get in to the building quickly . but this is not accurate or true . its not true because OSWALD according to frazier STOOD THERE BY THE CYCLONE FENCE waiting for him . so there was no quick rush by oswald , and according to frazier oswald waited for him .
what happens next ? . frazier said he sees oswald waiting , so he shuts off his engine and jumps out of the car . but by this time oswald has decided wes must not be coming and he strolls off . did he rush at this point ? NO not according to what frazier said .
Mr. FRAZIER - He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you know, and so he walked down behind the car and standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me to get out of the car, and so quick as I cut the engine off and started out of the car, shut the door just as I was starting out just like getting out of the car, he started walking off and so I followed him in.
So, eventually there he kept getting a little further ahead of me and I noticed we had plenty of time to get there because it is not too far from the Depository and usually I walk around and watch them switching the trains because you have to watch where you are going if you have to cross the tracks.
One day you go across one track and maybe there would be some cars sitting there and there would be another diesel coming there, so you have to watch when you cross the tracks, I just walked along and I just like to watch them switch the cars, so eventually he kept getting a little further ahead of me and by that time we got down there pretty close to the Depository Building there, I say, he would be as much as, I would say, roughly 50 feet in front of me but I didn't try to catch up with him because I knew I had plenty of time so I just took my time walking up there.
and there we have it . frazier DIDNT EVEN TRY TO CATCH UP WITH OSWALD
" I didn't try to catch up with him because I knew I had plenty of time so I just took my time walking up there"
so oswald being 50 feet ahead was not as much due to him RUSHING OFF QUICKLY but because frazier sat in his car and because he then decided he had no great hurry , he liked to watch the trains and so he strolled along at his own pace behind oswald . so its the most natural thing that oswald would be ahead of frazier .
so oswald DID NOT grab the package and rush of as quickly as he could leaving frazier behind , OSWALD WAITED FOR FRAZIER . to say oswald grabbed a package and quickly took off is a distortion of the truth by bugliosi , and bugliosi had to also omit VITAL info about oswald waiting in order to falsely make it look like oswald was guilty and rushing away quickly to hide the rifle and get it in to the building quickly .
when i post i provide the information , testimony , evidence etc , i NEVER tell people they MUST BELIEVE ME , or that they should simply TAKE MY WORD FOR IT . i simply give you the information , the facts , the testimony as i did above . after that people can decide for them selves . i invite people to check fraziers testimony and you will see the same testimony as above .
please dont ever simply just accept what someone like bugliosi just says or writes , or what you see in a video or documentray AS FACT , check as must as you can ANY and ALL so called facts .
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-8-refuted
when i look at a researcher be they bugliosi or myers or researcher on a forum like this i judge the content they post and claims they make on the level and years of research that they have . bugliosi had 22 years of research for his book , so there is zero excuse for him , if he claims that a piece of evidence proves that oswald was guilty i expect PROOF of that . i know from studying his work what he has researched and what he had access to , i mean in terms of documents and statements and testimony etc , and to be fair he had access to everything available whether he used it all or not .
so number 8 above , lets break it down , bugliosi is saying that upon arriving at the depository and parking up that oswald jumped out of wes fraziers car , grabbed a long package and took off about as fast as his little legs could carry him , leaving wes behind . so is this true and accurate ? well according to wes fraziers testimony its neither true or accurate . lets see .
Joseph Ball: What did he do about the package in the back seat when he got out of the car?Buell Wesley Frazier: Like I say, I was watching the gages and watched the car for a few minutes before I cut it off.Joseph Ball: Yes.Buell Wesley Frazier: He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you know, and so he walked down behind the car and standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me to get out of the car, and so quick as I cut the engine off and started out of the car, shut the door just as I was starting out just like getting out of the car, he started walking off and so I followed him in.
lets set the scene here . frazier upon arriving at the depository was a few minutes early . so he decided to sit in his car and let the engine run to charge the battery , my own opinion is that that is a bit strange given that the car had driven in from irving . so i really dont see how he could think sitting there for a minute or two with the engine running would charge the battery all that much more . but he also said that when early that he liked to watch the trains in the railyard . so being a few minutes early frazier sat in his car .
he notices that oswald is STILL THERE WAITING FOR HIM , yes thats right frazier said OSWALD WAS WAITING FOR HIM
"standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me " , but wait didnt bugliosi say oswald grabbed his package and walked quicky ahead of frazier ? in fact he did .
"Oswald picked up the long package on the backseat and, for the first time ever, walked quickly ahead of Frazier"
bugliosis number 8 is not a complete lie but he worded it deceptively and omitted vital information , information we know for a fact that he had . he had fraziers testimony as he cited and quoted from it , so he knew that frazier said OSWALD WAITED FOR HIM , in fact he mentioned that in his earlier book . YET HE OMITS THIS VITAL INFORMATION in his numebr 8 in reclaiming history .
WHY ? , well very clearly his 53 so called pieces of evidence was designed with the intent to state that they are all highly suspicious or make oswald look highly guilty . so if he admitted that oswald STOOD THERE WAITING FOR FRAZIER it would make it difficult for bugiosi to make oswald look guilty by russing away , so he omitted that important information .
he also uses the word QUICKLY as a means to emphasize that oswald was in a hurry to get away from frazier , because he had a rifle and wanted to get in to the building quickly . but this is not accurate or true . its not true because OSWALD according to frazier STOOD THERE BY THE CYCLONE FENCE waiting for him . so there was no quick rush by oswald , and according to frazier oswald waited for him .
what happens next ? . frazier said he sees oswald waiting , so he shuts off his engine and jumps out of the car . but by this time oswald has decided wes must not be coming and he strolls off . did he rush at this point ? NO not according to what frazier said .
Mr. FRAZIER - He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you know, and so he walked down behind the car and standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me to get out of the car, and so quick as I cut the engine off and started out of the car, shut the door just as I was starting out just like getting out of the car, he started walking off and so I followed him in.
So, eventually there he kept getting a little further ahead of me and I noticed we had plenty of time to get there because it is not too far from the Depository and usually I walk around and watch them switching the trains because you have to watch where you are going if you have to cross the tracks.
One day you go across one track and maybe there would be some cars sitting there and there would be another diesel coming there, so you have to watch when you cross the tracks, I just walked along and I just like to watch them switch the cars, so eventually he kept getting a little further ahead of me and by that time we got down there pretty close to the Depository Building there, I say, he would be as much as, I would say, roughly 50 feet in front of me but I didn't try to catch up with him because I knew I had plenty of time so I just took my time walking up there.
and there we have it . frazier DIDNT EVEN TRY TO CATCH UP WITH OSWALD
" I didn't try to catch up with him because I knew I had plenty of time so I just took my time walking up there"
so oswald being 50 feet ahead was not as much due to him RUSHING OFF QUICKLY but because frazier sat in his car and because he then decided he had no great hurry , he liked to watch the trains and so he strolled along at his own pace behind oswald . so its the most natural thing that oswald would be ahead of frazier .
so oswald DID NOT grab the package and rush of as quickly as he could leaving frazier behind , OSWALD WAITED FOR FRAZIER . to say oswald grabbed a package and quickly took off is a distortion of the truth by bugliosi , and bugliosi had to also omit VITAL info about oswald waiting in order to falsely make it look like oswald was guilty and rushing away quickly to hide the rifle and get it in to the building quickly .
when i post i provide the information , testimony , evidence etc , i NEVER tell people they MUST BELIEVE ME , or that they should simply TAKE MY WORD FOR IT . i simply give you the information , the facts , the testimony as i did above . after that people can decide for them selves . i invite people to check fraziers testimony and you will see the same testimony as above .
please dont ever simply just accept what someone like bugliosi just says or writes , or what you see in a video or documentray AS FACT , check as must as you can ANY and ALL so called facts .
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-8-refuted
Friday, October 27, 2017
What are the Content Mistakes in Essay Writing
You may not think of it as, but rather composing a compact and fascinating article is genuinely simple. This requesting and tedious occupation can be turned into an unadulterated satisfaction. The equitable fixation you need to do is to endure as a main priority a couple of “Never”, for the benefit of plausible trap to disregard are, by no assets compose an article, in which the placated does not recreate and increment the truthful subject, in no way, shape or form compose a paper without an introduction, Never compose an exposition without a proposition, in no way, shape or form compose an assessment discourse that you will be unsuccessful to grow because of the absence of thoughts, Never utilize thoughts, which you can't appear with cases, in no way, shape or form etch a paper without a conclusion. In the event that you yearn to acquire custom essay writing services. please remain to the site. This site encases one of a kind sort of the paper structures, structures and tips, and furthermore gives best rules about all the article composing. This is great and clear one.
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-What-are-the-Content-Mistakes-in-Essay-Writing
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-What-are-the-Content-Mistakes-in-Essay-Writing
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)