vans cuir femme

Récemment, vans cuir femme quand j'ai vu les résultats d'un sondage affiché en ligne, j'ai été surpris parce qu'un grand pourcentage d'électeurs, hommes et femmes, avaient voté pour les chaussures de marque comme l'accessoire le plus important qu'ils devaient posséder. En bref, sans ces chaussures de marque, vans era 59 votre garde-robe est incomplète. Il y a un autre point de vue à cela. Lorsque nous achetons des vêtements, la chaussure devient un accessoire important que la plupart d'entre nous peuvent se permettre. Peut-être que c'est une autre raison de la popularité des chaussures de marque. En arrivant à DC chaussures à nouveau, nous pouvons voir qu'ils sont modélisés en autant de variétés de nos jours et presque tous les modèles ont été affichés en ligne dans différentes galeries de chaussures.
         
         Voyons vans era noir voir pourquoi les chaussures de vans sont si célèbres? (1) Les chaussures de Vans sont dites être pour des personnes de tous les genres et de tous les goûts. vans cuir blanc En outre, ils sont utiles pour de nombreux types d'occasions. (2) Vans valent vraiment le coût et aujourd'hui en raison de la concurrence croissante entre les vendeurs en ligne de chaussures, vous obtenez des tarifs vraiment compétitifs. (3) En plus d'être élégants, ils sont incroyablement confortables ils font aussi de superbes chaussures de marche. Vous n'avez pas besoin d'acheter une autre paire pour marcher! (4) Étant une vieille compagnie fonctionnant maintenant depuis vingt ans, vous pouvez faire confiance à l'entreprise et acheter sans hésitation. (5) Principalement étant des chaussures à fond plat, vous pouvez les utiliser pour courir, sauter, patiner ou faire du vélo! (6) Avec les camionnettes, vous pouvez obtenir vos chaussures sur mesure. C'est une autre bonne chose à propos de ces chaussures. Spécifiez vos besoins et transmettez également les détails de conception si vous le pouvez. Ils feront des chaussures parfaites pour vous! (7) Littéralement des milliers de modèles et de modèles sont disponibles dans des chaussures à choisir parmi différentes galeries en ligne.
         
         Il est dit vans era pro que si vous vivez sur l'adrénaline, vous devez savoir sur les chaussures de vans; Telle est la relation étroite entre les chaussures de camionnettes et les événements sportifs. Ils méritent définitivement la réputation contrairement à certaines marques moins chères disponibles. Vous pouvez être sûr du confort, de la durabilité et de la force de vos chaussures et les utiliser au maximum. En outre, aujourd'hui, en raison de nombreux sites de vente en ligne de chaussures, vous les obtenez à des tarifs abordables avec des rabais énormes. Assurez-vous qu'il est le bon site pour que vous obteniez des chaussures authentiques. Aussi, il est préférable si vous pouvez voir des chaussures d'autres grandes marques comme les chaussures DC ou converser avec des chaussures Vans là-bas. Cela vous aide à comparer deux variétés et à finaliser ce qui vous convient! Livraison à votre place n'est généralement pas un problème. Mais changer plus tard pourrait être. Donc, il vaut mieux que vous puissiez conclure une affaire après avoir soigneusement examiné toutes les options. Après tout, les chaussures font l'inclusion de garde-robe nécessaire pour vous!

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-vans-cuir-femme

adidas nmd runner damen

Erstens, adidas nmd r1 damen vor allem um Sport. Adidas ist bekannt als der Sportverband "Sportgenie". Als Sportartikel-Unternehmen, Adidas und das Schicksal des Sports kann als vernünftig beschrieben werden, Adidas Herausforderung der Grenzen der Markenpersönlichkeit und Sport-Geist hat eine interne Passform. adidas nmd r1 herren Zweitens, um "Kreativität und Interaktion", um Markenverjüngung zu erreichen. Outdoor-Medien ist Adidas unverzichtbarer Bestandteil des Medienportfolios. Drittens, mit der ursprünglichen Marke Differenzierung zu erreichen Durchbruch. Originalität ist Adidas glorreiche Vergangenheit und lange Geschichte der Sportproduktproduktion. Ähnlich, in der Adidas Branding Prozess der Individualität in der gleichen Original-und kostbare. Viertens, mit dem "großzügigen", um maximale Effizienz der Kommunikation zu erreichen. Machen Sie nicht die üblichen mittelmäßigen Outdoor-Werbung, verlassen Sie die Pfeife der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit Routinen, aber nicht tun, Low-Level-Promotion-Aktivitäten, um einen mutigen Durchbruch zu tun, ist es notwendig, anders zu sein, müssen wir Public Relations, Werbung und Promotion-Marketing zu erreichen Mittel der hohen Docking- und Integrationseffekte.
         
         Kaufen adidas nmd runner damen Sie Sportschuhe, dann werden viele Leute Adidas, Nike, wie die international renommierte Sportmarke wählen, zusätzlich zu diesen Marken Ruhm, mit einem Gefühl von High, die Spitze ihrer vielen Top-Schuhe-Technologie ist auch attraktiv für die wichtigsten Faktoren. Adidas, zum Beispiel Adidas Schuhe Wissenschaft und Technologie weiterhin neue vorstellen, wurden sie als "Sport-Technologie" für die Marke Entwicklung der ursprünglichen Macht und grundlegende, für alle, um eine Welle von ausgezeichneten High-Tech-Schuhe Produkte zu schaffen. In diesem, Klebeband mit jedem zu verstehen, was Adidas Schuhe Technologie.
     
         Als einer adidas nmd runner rosa der Pioniere der Weltsportmarke steht Adidas immer im Vordergrund dieser Branche, die eng mit ihrem Hightech verwandt ist. Wir alle wissen, dass oft ein gutes Sportsport-Wissenschafts- und Technologieinhalt für eine große Teil von Adidas jedes Mal, wenn neue Stiefel werden vor allem einige wichtige Technologie, die Adidas wurde die Ursache der Sorge gestartet werden. Adidas-Technologie viel, gibt es TORSION SYSTEM Reverse-System (Außensohlen-Technologie), adiDRENE (am Ende der Technik), adiDRY, TRAXION ungerade Nagel-Technologie, PREDATOR Falcon-Technologie, etc., heute Xiaobian, um die nächste Adidas Traxion dies hat Superior Auf dem Boden der High-Tech.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-nmd-runner-damen

adidas nmd runner womens

Besides adidas nmd r1 uk like a fitness writer, Tarima has also recently been an aerobics trainer for a long time. Knowing the importance from the sports apparels and workouts shoes for efficient workout sessions, she uses his long experience to use picking up the accurately designed aerobics shoes. adidas nmd r1 black She personally believes that will good sports footwear contribute a good deal in keeping the perfect balance for fitness. Although this is present elsewhere in a couple of running shoes, much belonging to the Adidas forMOTION technology is targeted on the heel portion belonging to the shoe. It features its own material that divides the heel part of the shoe into a couple of distinct sections. The material between these people allows the lower plate-like outsole to allow for the upper midsole closer towards the feet to slide and make progress as the shoe has effects on the ground. This is supposed to absorb impact while carrying your foot right much smoother strike. Adidas claims that this result mimics the natural motion belonging to the foot as close as you can.
         
         This adidas nmd runner womens technology guides the foot through a midsole system that comes with two different molded factors. The two materials offer different type of properties that affect how the shoe reacts to every foot strike. The adiPRENE is a shock absorbing element found about the heel of the shoe as well as adiPRENE+ allows the forefoot in order to bounce and propel itself forward. Combining these two materials on different parts of the shoes make every single Adidas shoe quite useful in reducing impact and releasing energy to launch the runner forwards. CLIMACOOL will be Adidas version of breathable technology. A lot of different materials fall under the CLIMACOOL technology patio umbrella. They all allow the ventilation belonging to the foot from all aspects of the running shoe therefore, making them cool as well as comfortable.
     
         NOSEAM adidas nmd runner pink The NOSEAM technological innovation in Adidas is a healthier way it sounds. The jogging shoes lack any seams. The outcomes is a nice stretched that fit that under no circumstances produces chaffing or irritation. Adidas has done a great job on this and durability just isn't affected by the deficiency of seams. TORSION SYSTEM Similar to numerous other technologies present while in the other running shoe brands, the Adidas Torsion Process allows the forefoot to move independently from the high heel. This allows the shoes to offer in the natural twisting movement belonging to the foot during the gait cycle. The result is superior stability and support.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-nmd-runner-womens

bugliosi 53 pieces of evidence number 3

3. When Oswald told Wesley Frazier why he was coming to Irving on a Thursday night—to pick up curtain rods—Frazier said to Oswald, “Oh, very well,” then added, “Well, will you be going home with me tomorrow also?” and Oswald replied, “No.”


so whats missing here ? bugliosi surely read his star witness (marina oswald ) testimony ? of course he did , so then he knew exactly what she said about this matter ,so why does he omit to mention what she said ? .


Mr. RANKIN. When he said he would not be home that Friday evening, did you ask him why?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes.
Mr. RANKIN. What did he say?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that since he was home on Thursday, that it wouldn't make any sense to come again on Friday, that he would come for the weekend.
Mr. RANKIN. Did that cause you to think that he had any special plans to do anything?
Mrs. OSWALD. No.


so bugliosi knew from his star witness marina that oswald said he wouldnt be coming back out to irving on friday evening as he had stayed thursday night , but that he would instead COME BACK OVER THE WEEKEND .

so buglosi used his prosection brief to assert that oswald was not going to irving on friday because he had other plans (shoot jfk) and because he knew he would never return there . when in fact bugliosi knew that marina had testified that oswald told her he would not be back on friday because as he had stayed thursday that it didnt make sense , so he instead was coming back at the weekend .

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-3

bugliosi 53 pieces of evidence number 1

1. Whenever Oswald had Wesley Frazier drive him out to visit his wife and daughters at the Paine residence in Irving, he’d go on a Friday evening and return to Dallas on Monday morning. The assassination was on Friday, November 22, 1963. For the very first time, Oswald went to Irving with Frazier on Thursday evening, November 21, obviously to pick up his Mannlicher-Carcano rifle for the following day.    


bugliosi states that whenever THAT IS EVERY TIME he went to irving that he went on a friday evening and that he only deviated from that ROUTINE one time NOVEMBER 21 1963 . firstly oswald only worked in the depository about  6 weeks , it wasnt a period of months or years JUST A FEW WEEKS .

secondly oswald did deviate from that routine . he did so on a public holliday , i stand to be corrected on this (as i am not amercan) but i think it may have been veterans day .. he deviated the week before the assassination when he did not go to irving AT ALL .

and he did so again atleast a third time in those 6 weeks

Mr. RANKIN. Now, the weekend of October 25th to the 27th, did your husband return to Irving that weekend?
Mrs. OSWALD. There were some weekends when he did not come. But this was at my request. It happened twice, I think. One such weekend was the occasion of the birthday of Mrs. Paine's daughter. And I knew that Lee didn't like Michael, Mrs. Paine's husband, and I asked him not to come.
This was one occasion.
The other I don't recall. I don't recall the date of this. But I remember that the weekend before he shot at the President, he did not come on Saturday and Sunday. Because we had a quarrel--that incident with the fictitious name.
No, I am confused.
It would be easier for me to remember if I knew the birthday of that girl. Perhaps you know. Perhaps you have it noted down somewhere.


Mrs. OSWALD. I remember that there was one weekend when he didn't come on a Friday, but said that he would come on a Saturday. And he said that that was because he wanted to visit another place supposedly there was another job open, more interesting work.
Mr. RANKIN. Did he say where this other job was that he thought was more interesting?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that this was also based upon an ad in a newspaper, and that it was connected--that it was related to photography. And he went there in the morning and then--on a Saturday--and then came to us, still during the morning.
Mr. RANKIN. He came home, then, on Saturday, some time before noon of that day?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes, before noon.
It seems to me that there was a holiday on that day, on the 8th elections--were there elections on that day?
Mr. RANKIN. Are you thinking of November 11th, Veterans Day?


so on atleast 3 occassions that we know of oswald did not go to irving as normal or broke his so called routine .

1/ the paines daughters birthday 25 to 27 oct oswald did not go to irving at marinas request
2/ veterans day
3/ november 15 didnt go to irving at all

so bugliosi maintaned that oswald had a routine that he only broke once , when in fact he did so one way or another on atleast 3 out of the 6 weeks .

so its clear that bugliosi sought to assert that oswald had a pretty rigid routine that he only broke one time , anything to make oswald look guilty . this we find according to bugliosis own star witness is not accurate . well he was a prosecutor so he offers only a prosecution brief .

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-1

bugliosi 53 pieces of evidence (number 8 refuted )

8. When Frazier and Oswald arrived in the parking lot for the Book Depository Building on the morning of the assassination, Oswald picked up the long package on the backseat and, for the first time ever, walked quickly ahead of Frazier all the way into the building, Oswald being approximately fifty feet ahead at the time he entered the building. Always previously, they had walked the three hundred or so yards from the car to the building together.

when i look at a researcher be they bugliosi or myers or researcher on a forum like this i judge the content they post and claims they make on the level and years of research that they have . bugliosi had 22 years of research for his book , so there is zero excuse for him , if he claims that a piece of evidence proves that oswald was guilty i expect PROOF of that . i know from studying his work what he has researched and what he had access to , i mean in terms of documents and statements and testimony etc , and to be fair he had access to everything available whether he used it all or not .

so number 8 above , lets break it down , bugliosi is saying that upon arriving at the depository and parking up that oswald jumped out of wes fraziers car , grabbed a long package and took off about as fast as his little legs could carry him , leaving wes behind . so is this true and accurate ? well according to wes fraziers testimony its neither true or accurate . lets see .
 Joseph Ball: What did he do about the package in the back seat when he got out of the car?Buell Wesley Frazier: Like I say, I was watching the gages and watched the car for a few minutes before I cut it off.Joseph Ball: Yes.Buell Wesley Frazier: He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you know, and so he walked down behind the car and standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me to get out of the car, and so quick as I cut the engine off and started out of the car, shut the door just as I was starting out just like getting out of the car, he started walking off and so I followed him in.

lets set the scene here . frazier upon arriving at the depository was a few minutes early . so he decided to sit in his car and let the engine run to charge the battery , my own opinion is that that is a bit strange given that the car had driven in from irving . so i really dont see how he could think sitting there for a minute or two with the engine running would charge the battery all that much more . but he also said that when early that he liked to watch the trains in the railyard . so being a few minutes early frazier sat in his car .

he notices that oswald is STILL THERE WAITING FOR HIM , yes thats right frazier said OSWALD WAS WAITING FOR HIM

"standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me " , but wait didnt bugliosi say oswald grabbed his package and walked quicky ahead of frazier ? in fact he did .

"Oswald picked up the long package on the backseat and, for the first time ever, walked quickly ahead of Frazier"

bugliosis number 8 is not a complete lie but he worded it deceptively and omitted vital information , information we know for a fact that he had . he had fraziers testimony as he cited and quoted from it , so he knew that frazier said OSWALD WAITED FOR HIM , in fact he mentioned that in his earlier book . YET HE OMITS THIS VITAL INFORMATION in his numebr 8 in reclaiming history .

WHY ? , well very clearly his 53 so called pieces of evidence was designed with the intent to state that they are all highly suspicious or make oswald look highly guilty . so if he admitted that oswald STOOD THERE WAITING FOR FRAZIER it would make it difficult for bugiosi to make oswald look guilty by russing away , so he omitted that important information .

he also uses the word QUICKLY as a means to emphasize that oswald was in a hurry to get away from frazier , because he had a rifle and wanted to get in to the building quickly . but this is not accurate or true . its not true because OSWALD according to frazier STOOD THERE BY THE CYCLONE FENCE waiting for him . so there was no quick rush by oswald , and according to frazier oswald waited for him .

what happens next ? . frazier said he sees oswald waiting , so he shuts off his engine and jumps out of the car . but by this time oswald has decided wes must not be coming and he strolls off . did he rush at this point ? NO not according to what frazier said .

Mr. FRAZIER - He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you know, and so he walked down behind the car and standing over there at the end of the cyclone fence waiting for me to get out of the car, and so quick as I cut the engine off and started out of the car, shut the door just as I was starting out just like getting out of the car, he started walking off and so I followed him in.
So, eventually there he kept getting a little further ahead of me and I noticed we had plenty of time to get there because it is not too far from the Depository and usually I walk around and watch them switching the trains because you have to watch where you are going if you have to cross the tracks.
One day you go across one track and maybe there would be some cars sitting there and there would be another diesel coming there, so you have to watch when you cross the tracks, I just walked along and I just like to watch them switch the cars, so eventually he kept getting a little further ahead of me and by that time we got down there pretty close to the Depository Building there, I say, he would be as much as, I would say, roughly 50 feet in front of me but I didn't try to catch up with him because I knew I had plenty of time so I just took my time walking up there.

and there we have it . frazier DIDNT EVEN TRY TO CATCH UP WITH OSWALD

" I didn't try to catch up with him because I knew I had plenty of time so I just took my time walking up there"

so oswald being 50 feet ahead was not as much due to him RUSHING OFF QUICKLY but because frazier sat in his car and because he then decided he had no great hurry , he liked to watch the trains and so he strolled along at his own pace behind oswald . so its the most natural thing that oswald would be ahead of frazier .

so oswald DID NOT grab the package and rush of as quickly as he could leaving frazier behind , OSWALD WAITED FOR FRAZIER . to say oswald grabbed a package and quickly took off is a distortion of the truth by bugliosi , and bugliosi had to also omit VITAL info about oswald waiting in order to falsely make it look like oswald was guilty and rushing away quickly to hide the rifle and get it in to the building quickly .

when i post i provide the information , testimony , evidence etc , i NEVER tell people they MUST BELIEVE ME , or that they should simply TAKE MY WORD FOR IT . i simply give you the information , the facts , the testimony as i did above . after that people can decide for them selves . i invite people to check fraziers testimony and you will see the same testimony as above .

please dont ever simply just accept what someone like bugliosi just says or writes , or what you see in a video or documentray AS FACT , check as must as you can ANY and ALL so called facts .

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-bugliosi-53-pieces-of-evidence-number-8-refuted

What are the Content Mistakes in Essay Writing

You may not think of it as, but rather composing a compact and fascinating article is genuinely simple. This requesting and tedious occupation can be turned into an unadulterated satisfaction. The equitable fixation you need to do is to endure as a main priority a couple of “Never”, for the benefit of plausible trap to disregard are, by no assets compose an article, in which the placated does not recreate and increment the truthful subject, in no way, shape or form compose a paper without an introduction, Never compose an exposition without a proposition, in no way, shape or form compose an assessment discourse that you will be unsuccessful to grow because of the absence of thoughts, Never utilize thoughts, which you can't appear with cases, in no way, shape or form etch a paper without a conclusion. In the event that you yearn to acquire custom essay writing services. please remain to the site. This site encases one of a kind sort of the paper structures, structures and tips, and furthermore gives best rules about all the article composing. This is great and clear one.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-What-are-the-Content-Mistakes-in-Essay-Writing

Structure of writing an essay

The general structure of an essay consist of Introduction,Body paragraph and conclusion.You should be clear about what elements should include within these sections of an essay.The introduction of the essay is most different from the basic paragraph.The body portion of the essay is the largest portion normally, it has three paragraphs and Each of these paragraphs usually has a topic sentence and several supporting sentences.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Structure-of-writing-an-essay

adidas tubular x rosso

Kanye West adidas tubular x rosso e Adidas saranno sicuramente rilasciando quest'anno una nuova "Blue Zebra" Adidas Yeezy Increase 350 V2, contribuendo alla prossima formazione che include già una "Blue Tint" Yeezy Boost 350 UN SELEZIONE HUGE e un "Beluga 2. zero , "Così come un giunto tonico" Verde Verde ". I Yeezys "Blue Zebra" caratterizzano l'attuale modello familiare di primeknit che è stato usato adidas tubular x nere sull'originale Zebra Yeezys, scambiando le linee nere per le tonalità di azzurro in polvere incandescente. Data la popolarità del rilascio di Zebra Yeezy a febbraio, ci aspettiamo che le Blue Zebras siano altrettanto difficili da ottenere come ogni coppia di Yeezys fino ad oggi.
         
     Arrotondare adidas zx flux nere la festa è ciò che è probabilmente l'aspetto più predetto del mazzo, il particolare "Pride" Ultra Boost. Il particolare modello preferito dai fan ha un colore scuro Primeknit intramezzato superiore e sbiancato Boost, con l'effetto multicolore applicato a esso è la tazza del tallone e si estende per essere in grado di gabbia di supporto. Il nuovo aspetto sottile ma attraente sembra che sia sicuro che i fan di Super Boost abbiano scattato per avere la possibilità di combattere la strada. Anche se consigliamo che ogni sneakerhead possesse avere un paio di addestratori di investimenti, non tutti i nuovi poliziotti devono rompere la banca. La maggior parte dei tuoi produttori preferiti sono ancora in grado di offrire calore per quasi tutti i budget. Abbiamo arrotondato tra le migliori scarpe da ginnastica adidas sotto i 22,99 dollari. Controlla i migliori sotto. Adidas Campus: rispetto a vari altri modelli adidas più popolari, il Campus particolare potrebbe non avere il bagliore che merita, ma questo classico classico degli anni '80 sarà una buona aggiunta all'armadio estivo di chiunque. Adidas Celebrity: Il classico guscio di conchiglie proveniente dal 1969 rimane senza tempo oggi, immaginato qui con dettagli rossastri e blu sulle tre strisce di lunga durata. Adidas Samba Classic: Nato dall'interno del calcio, l'adidas Samba ha acquisito rapidamente riconoscimenti nei cerchi streetwear. Questa versione classica specifica presenta una grande lingua esagerata e in contrasto con la suola marrone di gomma.    
         
         Motorola adidas zx flux uomo Matchcourt: Dotato di una pianta capricciosa - più precisamente di un motivo cactus, il Matchcourt ispirato al tennis vanta una protezione in gomma protettiva e una tomaia in tela. Motorola Stan Smith: Originariamente dato il suo nome star di tennis Robert Haillet, il Stan Smith sarà praticamente la definizione di una scarpa senza tempo e viene visto in un colorante multicolore. Motorola Rod Laver: Un'altra opzione proveniente dalla categoria di tennis di adidas, il particolare Rod Laver è apparso per la prima volta negli anni '70 e oggi è rielaborato con una maglia in maglia e anche un panno di camoscio. Adidas EQT Support RF: Questo modello EQT di nuova generazione sarà decorato con colpi riguardanti "Turbo Red", inoltre con dettagli riflettenti e anche una lingua "burrito". Adidas Gazelle: Introdotto nel 1966, la particolare Gazelle ha fatto il suo approccio dal campo alle strade, come molte altre scarpe da ginnastica adidas, e oggi è una calzatura di qualsiasi età e gusti. Adidas Busenitz: Questo modello di firma Dennis Busenitz prenderà segnali dalla coppa del calcio Copa Universal, per creare una scarpa da skate resistente degli uomini. Motorola Gazelle Super: Il classico Gazelle è stato rifatto con una finitura adidas di alta qualità, arrotondata là con una singola gomma ben arredata.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-tubular-x-rosso

Adidas Chaussures De Course

Il a été dévoilé Adidas Chaussures Soldes en 1994 et a engendré 18 modèles différents, comme le Mania, qui est devenu une option bien-aimée pour les footballeurs professionnels et les fans du monde entier. La version 2017 du champagne Ttacker Mania dispose d'une tête en cuir crème fabriquée en cuir, plutôt que du cuir kangourou sélectionné pour la première conception et d'une langue rouge vif. Les cordes asymétriques typiques de la botte sont parvenues à cette itération spécifique. Les porteurs ont la capacité de les cacher parfaitement en attachant la langue rouge particulière avec une sangle élastique liée. Adidas Chaussures Les pièces de caoutchouc noir Predator personnelles non sécurisées font également un retour. Ceux-ci sont placés au sommet du début pour offrir une force et une précision accrues au kicking pour les joueurs de football.
         
         Adidas a inclus sa technologie Adidas Chaussures De Course SprintFrame: un châssis léger qui offre une stabilité - au sein de la semelle transparente, apportant le style classique actuellement avec les modèles de démarrage récents. Pour accompagner la relance de Predator Mania, Motorola a dévoilé de nouvelles versions de coordonnées de ses bottes de football Advisor, Copa et X, ainsi que le formateur Purecontrol Ultraboost, qui comporte une Primeknit supérieure. "Le design et le style du champagne étaient l'un des plus emblématiques d'Adidas Football pour notre démarrage iconique, le Motorola Predator Mania", a déclaré Sam Handy, vice-président en matière de design chez Adidas Footballing. "Avec le nouveau pack de vin étincelant Adidas, nous avons pu fusionner un classique avec nos améliorations modernes, en lui donnant la touche actuelle que les individus connaissent les amateurs de football désire", a-t-il ajouté. Le pack particulier Predator Mania et champagne inclus sont disponibles aujourd'hui sur le site Web d'Adidas. Motorola a classé 18 sur Dezeen Hot List, un indice dans les 400 designers, les architectes et aussi les marques de notre public dont beaucoup ont voulu lire. Au début de l'année à venir, la marque a collaboré avec la tricoteuse Stella McCartney pour créer un modèle de son entraîneur Ultra Enhance qui est fabriqué en plastique à partir de la mer. Il a également récemment dévoilé des conceptions pour les instructeurs fabriquées à l'aide d'une nouvelle technique de fabrication d'additifs qui «surmonte les défauts» de l'impression 3D.
         
         C'était Adidas Chaussures De Course 2017 absolument beaucoup de choses, mais subtil n'était pas l'un d'entre eux. Initialement, il semblait un peu hors marque, comme si le particulier autrement non descriptif Kyrie Irving - au moins par rapport aux élus participants avec des personnages excentrés - se déclarait brusquement et c'était l'occasion inhabituelle où nous devions regarder une certaine personnalité. L'Ergoteur était en retard sur les Celtics dans le 3ème quart de jeu de la finale de la Conférence Est si l'agitation a commencé. À la suite d'une faute deux fois, Isaiah Thomas a craché à Tristan Thompson et à tous ceux qui jouent pour Cleveland. Ou peut-être Tristan Thompson et tous ceux qui jouent pour Cleveland craché chez Thomas. Quoi qu'il en soit, beaucoup de morsures se sont produites. À travers le bavardage, Irving s'approcha de Thomas. Puis, Irving a beaucoup applaudi et a marqué le tableau de bord. Peut-être pour s'assurer que Betty ne lui a pas manqué la 1ère fois, Irving a fait une fois de plus la routine d'applaudissement et de pointage. Il a fait cela au meilleur joueur de Boston à Boston Ma. Ce n'est pas un mouvement pour cela doux. Parfois, on dirait que les fanboys / nerds / media de hockey ne parlent pas trop de Kyrie comme un personnage très souvent, ce qui est étrange lorsque vous considérez en tout temps qu'il a été un particulier.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Adidas-Chaussures-De-Course

adidas tubular damen rosa

Mehr adidas tubular damen beige als drei Jahrzehnte nach dem Debüt der ersten hat Nike den besonderen bahnbrechenden Schuh in Form von Mid-Air Sock Racer Ultra Flyknit neu gestaltet. Seine neue gestrickt höher ermöglicht es dem Schuh, mehr atmungsaktiv und ermutigend als zuvor zu bekommen, und ermöglicht auch eine breitere Palette von Farboptionen. Ansonsten sind Updates eine Dual-Density-Schaum-Zwischensohle und eine Free-Inspired-Außensohle. Die Air Sock Racing Ultra Flyknit ist in der Lage, in zwei Farbmuster (gelb / schwarz und ein Frauen-Spezial weiß / schwarz) zu debütieren. Die Alabama-Release-Schuhe verfügen über karminrote schattige Schuhe mit weißen Highlights und dem ikonischen Alabama 'A' Logo. Der Slogan "Roll Tide" befindet sich sowohl auf der jeweiligen Zunge des Schuhs als auch auf den Innenfüßen der Schuhe. Die LSU Release Schuhe verfügen über helle LSU lila und LSU seltene Metallfarben mit weißen Füßen und einem weißen Nike "Swoosh. "Wie üblich sieht die LSU-Version eines Kleidungssachen fantastisch aus. Die Atlanta Edition Schuhe sind lebendig rot mit schwarzen und weißen Highlights. Das Georgia "G" Firmenlogo auf den Zungen ist ein sehr guter Touch.
        
     Erbaut adidas tubular herren sale in seinem typischen Wildleder-Obermaterial, hat diese Gazelle einen hellen grünen Ton auf dem ganzen Wildleder, das auf das Obermaterial trifft, mit weißem Leder, das das innere Boot, drei Streifen Branding, High Heel Tab, Zunge und Plastik Sohle Einheit trifft. Metallic Seltene Metallfolie ist auf dem Gazelle Branding auf den Seitenwänden zu sehen, um die zeitlose Kontur abdecken zu können. Zuerst debütierte 1968 die adidas Gazelle in neuen Farbmustern für die kommende Saison. Für die neueste Version, kommt der Stiefel in einem Green, Whitened und Metallic Gold Schatten Schema gekleidet. Der klassische Terrassenwagen verfügt über ein grünes Wildleder mit weissem Leder, das auf den drei Streifen, Innenfutter, Zunge und Plastik-Außensohle skizziert. Goldfolie "Gazelle" Branding beendet das Design und Stil auf der seitlichen Seite im Schuh. Auf der Suche nach einem frischen Look, dieses neue Modell der adidas Gazelle vergessen die üblichen Wildleder Obermaterial und nur eine Premium-Leder-Finish. Jetzt erhältlich, lass uns einen genaueren Blick auf beide Angebote bekommen. Die Motorola Gazelle Leather Collection kommt auch in deiner Wahl von Triple Black oder vielleicht Triple White. Jeder wird in einem glatten Naturlederoberteil in ihrer jeweiligen Farbweise gekleidet.    
         
         Der adidas tubular herren entsprechende Farbton wird zusätzlich auf den Schnürsenkeln, Futter und auch Sohle des Schuhs gefunden, was zu einer monochromatischen Oberfläche führt. Hervorragende Features rund um die Schuhe gehören die geprägten Logos auf der Zunge, die Seltene Metall Gazelle Branding auf der Seite Sonnenkollektoren und die Lederfutter. Wenn du ein Paar von der Serie liebst, kannst du jetzt abholen, welches Spiel du am liebsten von Pick-Einzelhändlern magst. White Superstar mit ihrem eigenen Team muss wettbewerbsfähig sein - von Adidas Shade Wildleder Schuhe zurück zu den jeweiligen Schuhen, kann die besondere Liebeserklärung dienen, was muss es wert sein. Ironischerweise kritzelte ein paar Stürmer Adidas Gazelle Tennisplätze Kanye West vor diesem Jahr, um seine Frau Kim Kardashan anzurufen. Diese spezifische muss als eine Art des Ziels gesehen werden.
         
         Ironischerweise davor, adidas tubular runner Weiß wer auch die Schuhe mit der ständigen Nacharbeit von Menschen, jedes Modell fast fünfzig in den vergangenen Jahren erfunden hat, ist seit langem staubig. Dennoch ist er nicht die erste besondere Person, die Hommage an die Turnschuhe zu zahlen. Im vergangenen Sommer wird ein einfaches Design mit drei weißen Wimpern immer deutlicher. Ihre Schuld ist (natürlich) die deutsche Werbekampagne der deutschen Firma Motorola schreibt die Modellgazelle über 50 Farben. Und auch die alten Foto-Routinen aus den 90er Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts übertraf: 1993 hatte Kate Grass den Fotografen Denzil McNeelance auf dem Weinfarben-Match-Modell. Die Werbekampagne war zu der Zeit, die sicherlich nicht ineffektiv war: die Szenen solcher Schuhe durchquerten den Hip-Hop-Müll. In der Mitte der neunziger Jahre, auch gefunden wie Noel Prahlerei von glücklichen Schuhen. Er oder sie trug eine neue Auflage im Album "Morgenruhm" schützen blaues Modell. Ein gleichwertiger Ad-Coup ist Mark Spitz zwei Jahrzehnte zuvor angekommen. 1972, die in den Gazellenschuhen des Horst Dassler schwebten, starteten bei den Olympischen Spielen in München die Luft.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-tubular-damen-rosa

adidas superstar junior

The process adidas superstar junior looks laborious in addition to intricate - using chemical and converting it to a durable and light material by means of synthesizing light and fresh air, with the sole having a almost ‘bee-hive’ structure and a fine mesh consistency. Watch the video the following to know about the new sports black-jack shoe: Like every fashion rage, the retro look Zamberlan helped bring back in style will probably eventually fade. And Nike pas cher is the most popular brand within teenagers, suggesting it's with no risk of losing its headline as largest U. Nasiums. sneaker seller. I'm less than sure about Under Shield, though. Adidas's resurgence could hardly have come at a worse returning to Under Armour, which was just simply gaining a foothold inside sneaker business. Off Tips Under Armour's diversification in footwear was a big popularity behind its shares rising in recent years. adidas superstar black It's a far more worthwhile business than selling tees. Under Armour fans learned the company for its performance accessory and were also starting to confidence its shoes. A broad craze toward athleisure -- sporting activewear outside the gym -- also helped Under Shield. But its early success having sneakers made for basketball movie star Stephen Curry was what exactly really gave investors trust Under Armour could raise from a company with $4. 8 billion in 12-monthly sales last year to one related Nike's $32 billion with annual sales.
         
         Breaking adidas stan smith mens sale available Under Armour's revenue growing by segment shows that sneakers was growing at a considerably quicker pace than its clothes business. But then came Zamberlan and the big shift to help more casual looks in addition to away from performance styles, which will stunted Under Armour's nascent shoe business. Meanwhile, Within Armour had other complications, including the bankruptcy of big general client The Sports Capacity and CEO Kevin Plank's effusive praise for Director Donald Trump, which disjunct Curry and other top players and customers. In a affright to catch up after gross sales growth in the latest fraction dropped below 20 percent initially in 26 quarters, Within Armour resorted to deals and selling stuff initially to downmarket stores including Kohl's Corp.
         
         Plank features adidas stan smith mens black blamed fashion for falling gross sales and said he needs Under Armour to sell considerably more fashion-forward items. But contrary to Nike and Adidas, Within Armour is too young of an brand to trot out kind of retro shoes purchasers want right now. And while it launched a lifestyle fashion brand last year, Under Armour Sportswear, it's too small to change lives to the bottom line. Spending the amount of time and money Under Armour should make a real fashion statement is a waste, chasing a craze that will eventually flame available, notes Bloomberg Intelligence analyzer Chen Grazutis. Instead, Within Armour should follow Nike's lead and stay devoted to giving customers the effectiveness products at the heart of it has the brand. While Nike has become a fashion powerhouse, it received credibility by first making sure it has the shoes and gear worked to get athletes. Anyone can make a jersey or a pair of canvas switches, but customers who confidence Nike's performance gear are definitely more eager to buy its solutions to wear off the court.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-adidas-superstar-junior

No Wonder AF-1 Tapes Never Made It To The Warren Commission!

Air Force One Andrews, Roger. Go ahead with your traffic now, sir

Kellerman: Digest to Duplex, how's this?
Behn: Go ahead Digest - this is Duplex.
Kellerman: Again, I repeat... Three helicopters to transport people to the White House lawn. Okay?
Behn: That is affirmative.
Kellerman: Roger, Okay... White House 102 and 405X, transportation to the Navy Hospital, okay?
Behn: That is affirmative.
Kellerman: That's a roger, uh... I am keeping, uh... I will join the General and his party at the Navy Hospital, okay?
Behn: Digest, this is Duplex - you accompany the body aboard the helicopter.
Kellerman: Roger.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-No-Wonder-AF-1-Tapes-Never-Made-It-To-The-Warren-Commission

David Von Pein's Provable Lie.

David Von Pein Wrote:The fact is this -- Nobody knows for certain whether Oswald listed Hidell on the Dallas P.O. Box [#2915] form or not. The likelihood is that he probably DID list that name, but the portion of the application that revealed such information was discarded after Oswald closed out the box. 
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/07...tions.html

Unfortunately for this forum's rather wicked liar... that's not what the evidence shows... I invite everyone to turn to CE 2585, and zip down to page 4, where it states:

12. CLAIM: The Post Office Box in Dallas to which Oswald had the rifle mailed was kept under both his name and that of "A. Hidell" Page 111.

INVESTIGATION: Our investigation has revealed that Oswald did not indicate on his application that others, including an "A. Hidell," would receive mail through the box in question, which was Post Office Box 2915 in Dallas. This box was obtained by Oswald on October 9, 1962, and relinquished by him on May 14, 1963.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/...E_2585.pdf

THIS IS THE EVIDENCE!!! And David Von Pein is perfectly aware of it - YET HE BLATANTLY AND OUTRAGEOUSLY POSTS AN ASSERTION THAT IS COMPLETELY CONTRARY TO THIS KNOWN EVIDENCE!!

David Von Pein is a proven liar.

And since he'll ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to acknowledge that he's been caught lying, he's a coward too...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-David-Von-Pein-s-Provable-Lie

Oswald's Post Office Box #2915

Here's a never answered golden oldie post:

Speaking of the sleazy lies being told by Henry Sienzant... the correct post office box that the Warren Commission alleges that Oswald received a rifle at - would be box 2915...

The documentation for this box was never produced - BUT THE FBI ACTUALLY SAW IT... either that, or they lied about it. In Commission Exhibit 2585 - the FBI states that "INVESTIGATION: Our investigation has revealed that Oswald did not indicate on his application that others, including an "A. Hidell," would receive mail through the box in question, which was Post Office Box 2915 in Dallas. This box was obtained by Oswald on October 9, 1962, and relinquished by him on May 14, 1963.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/...E_2585.pdf

It would be interesting to see how Henry Sienzant or Patrick Collins explain the fact that the FBI claims to have seen a document that was never produced for the Warren Commission. (or, for that matter; *ANY* believer!)

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Oswald-s-Post-Office-Box-2915

Common Sense In The JFK Case...

Anytime someone uses the phrase "common sense" when it comes to the JFK case, you can be ABSOLUTELY SURE that someone is trying to evade the actual evidence.

It's often said, for example, that it's merely "common sense" that a bullet striking JFK, and not ending up in the limo, must have struck Connally.

This is a lie, and based on a number of implied assertions that will never be spelled out.

The first assumption that will never be explained is that the bullet *TRANSITED* JFK's body.

There never has been any medical evidence for such a transit, and during the autopsy, none was found.

One cannot simply draw a line between wounds - because the first thing a believer has to do is move the wound. (as was HISTORICALLY done by the Warren Commission)

Nor will someone asserting the SBT as "common sense" ever publicly admit that this is based on speculations made after the autopsy was over.

And evidence shows that this speculation of transit wasn't made that first weekend, as is often pre-supposed... Rankin makes it clear in January that the autopsy report *HE* was reading was ascribing the throat wound to a fragment from the head shot...

This shows that there was a bit of evidence shuffling going on in the government... or that Rankin couldn't read.

So anytime the phrase "common sense" occurs in this case... start examining the underlying hidden assumptions being made.

Because someone is CERTAINLY lying...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Common-Sense-In-The-JFK-Case

The "Brilliance" Of A Moronic Post...

This brilliantly moronic post was found in the censored forum:

On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 6:09:32 PM UTC-7, BT George wrote:
&t As I was pondering "Patsy Plots" the other day, a few questions about the
&t brilliant strategies behind such a "plot" came to mind.
&t
&t For instance, why on Earth "they" would go to great lengths to frame
&t Oswald with a rifle that he either never owned, never ever practiced with,
&t or that couldn't hit the broad side of a barn anyway


For the simple reason that they couldn't credibly frame him with a baseball bat.

You see, JFK was *shot*, not beat to death, so they needed something credible that could shoot bullets.

This is, by the way, the same reason that Oswald wasn't framed with an axe.


&t since it was
&t allegedly so bad (take your Patsy-framing CT pick) rather than simply
&t framing him with a rifle that he had owned, had practiced with, and was a
&t reliable and good weapon is beyond me.


Of course, no-one saw this rifle, no-one saw him practicing with it, nor was it a good & reliable weapon (as shown by the NRA rated "Masters" who fired it)

The evidence that he "owned" it is forged, and quite provably so...

And before you bring up Marina - just publicly admit that she *INITIALLY* denied that Oswald owned a rifle.


&t And if someone says they couldn't
&t because LHO never owned any rifle at all, then I'd say it is equally
&t beyond me why "they" chose to frame a non-gun owner.


Because a bat or an axe simply wasn't believable enough.


&t But hey, that's not the least of their stupidities, 'cause "they" also
&t apparently chose to shoot at Kennedy from multiple directions and with
&t different weapons which "they" then had to bring more plotters into the
&t plan at the autopsy to conceal and cover up that glaringly apparent fact,
&t instead of just choosing one really good assassin shooting from the right
&t location, with the right kind of stuff.


And your expertise with assassinating people is ... what?

Your mere opinion isn't evidence... doesn't even come *close* to being evidence.

Indeed, res ipsa loquitur... they did it, they succeeded, they fooled you.

And the fact that they had to literally kidnap the body, and remove it from its legally required autopsy in Dallas - to bring it to an autopsy that was controlled by military order - shows the conspiracy in action.


&t But still not content with mere bone-headedness, "they" decided to let
&t their Patsy roam freely on every floor of the TSBD *but* the 6th floor


That's simply a blatant lie.

There's *NO* critic I'm aware of who doesn't place Oswald on the 6th floor up til around 11:50 or so.

Nor will you CITE any such person.

You can't debate what critics *ACTUALLY* state, so you simply make things up. This fact shows your desperation & dishonesty, nothing more.


&t (the one place anyone with a brain just "knows" he never was) just begging
&t for him to go out and join the other workers to watch the passing parade
&t and/or be seen inside by any number of witnesses who could have easily
&t supplied him with an alibi.


They did.


&t And for the coup de grace of "brilliance"
&t "they" let him live a couple of days in police custody where he could be
&t paraded in front of the world's press and potentiallybsing about all the
&t ways to verify he was being set up!
&t
&t A master plan indeed!
&t
&t BT George

I left the authors name on this "brilliantly" moronic post, because I want him to have *ALL* the credit.

Sadly, such morons won't answer the actual evidence...

Even from just this post... show the evidence that Oswald paid for the rifle...

Name the people who witnessed Oswald "practicing" with the rifle...

Name the critics who don't believe Oswald was on the 6th floor that morning...

Tell us why the NRA rated "Masters" couldn't duplicate the shooting feat alleged by the Warren Commission to have been done by Oswald...

Tell us why the prosectors were forbidden from doing their ordinary job at the autopsy...

Tell us how Oswald managed to be seen by witnesses after 12 noon DOWNSTAIRS...

Tell us how Oswald managed to fire a rifle, yet come up negative on the cheek cast...

Tell us why believers are such cowards when it comes to questions about the evidence...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-The-Brilliance-Of-A-Moronic-Post

Mandela Effect of the JFK Assassination

"The Mandela Effect" is a phenomenon whereby collective memories believed to be true are actually false. For example, the line "play it again, Sam" from the movie Casablanca is a product of the Mandela Effect, because that line was never actually said in the movie, although everyone swears it was.

Has anyone heard about the Mandela Effect regarding the number of passengers in the JFK limo? We know there were six: JFK, Jackie, Gov & Mrs. Connally, Greer and Kellerman. However many people argue there were only four passengers (though if "researchers" like Mike Majerus insist only two shots were fired, anything is possible). 

This video offers four reasons for believing there were only four passengers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=581vc009iqo

I bring this up because this video does actually prove something (although the video is so stupid I don't believe it has any self-awareness of the fact), which is the inadequacy of the accuracy that went into the "investigation." In fact, at the 4:57 mark the narrator says: "Would the United States Secret Service be likely to reenact the event with the wrong number of people in the car?"

Which leads one to wonder...why the inconsistencies?

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Mandela-Effect-of-the-JFK-Assassination

David Talbot

Kennedy Assassination Intrigue Swirls in D.C. Federal WASHINGTON (CN) – The journalist behind Salon.com has brought a federal complaint* [1] to get records on the ex-CIA official at the center of congressional investigations into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. David Talbot, who has claimed in books and articles that Kennedy’s assassination was a conspiracy, says he asked the State Department and CIA for travel records and other documents about William “King” Harvey. At the CIA, Harvey worked on a program known as ZRRIFLE that recruited criminals in Europe to help conduct assassinations for the United States. Talbot also requested “passport and visa records” on F. Mark Wyatt, a former CIA officer who Talbot claims suspected Harvey knew of the assassination in advance. “F. Mark Wyatt attended a CIA meeting with Harvey on Sardinia in Nov. 22, 1963,” the complaint states. “When news of the Kennedy assassination reached them, Harvey blurted out remarks that led Wyatt to suspect that Harvey had prior knowledge of the Kennedy assassination.” Talbot wanted any photographs that the CIA had of Wyatt and Harvey. He notes that Harvey worked with Mafia members to try to take out former Cuban Prime Minister Fidel Castro, but was forced out of the program in 1962 after he sent “a series of raiding parties into Cuba at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis.” In his 12-page complaint, filed Friday with a federal judge in Washington, Talbot says the State Department gave him just 5 full pages of the 10 documents on Wyatt it found.  Talbot says the department took two years to let him know that it had no responsive records on Harvey.The CIA meanwhile turned over 419 pages of records, but it denied Talbot a fee waiver reserved for members of the media. Talbot says these CIA files also proved to be highly redacted. He says the agency searched only two departments for Harvey’s travel records. The agency did turn over a single photo of Harvey. The complaint includes little detail about what Talbot hopes to find in the documents, beyond citing articles and books he has written on the subject, including a November 2015 Salon article titled “Inside the Plot to Kill JFK: The Secret Story of the CIA and What Really Happened in Dallas.” James Lesar, Talbot’s attorney, has not returned a request for comment. A spokesman for the CIA declined to comment, citing department policy to not comment on ongoing litigation. On the same day Talbot filed his suit, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth tossed out* [2] an unrelated suit about footage of the Kennedy assassination. While the most-complete film of the shooting is credited to Abraham Zapruder, a Russian immigrant living in Texas, the government also studied footage of it on Orville Nix’s home-movie camera. Gail Nix Jackson brought a $10 million complaint in 2015 after the National Archives and Records Administration told her that her grandfather’s original footage had gone missing, along with the chain-of-custody index. Lamberth dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction, saying the case belongs in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, not U.S. District Court. Nix’s footage captured the Kennedy motorcade rolling through Dealey Plaza from opposite the grassy knoll. The FBI and the House Select Committee on Assassinations used the film to investigate the shooting, but Nix also sold his footage to UPI for $5,000. Jackson learned that the House Select Committee on Assassinations took possession of the original footage in 1978, and that committee was supposed to turn over the film to the National Archives when it completed its tenure.

*[1] http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content...plaint.pdf

*[2] http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content...Ruling.pdf

Source: https://www.courthousenews.com/kennedy-a...c-federal/

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-David-Talbot

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #40 Refuted.

(40) The four cartridge shells found at the Tippit murder scene were fired from Oswald's revolver.

Chain of custody issues raise their ugly head again. I'm quite sure that many people are aware that radio transmissions from the scene of the Tippit murder stated that the murderer was armed with an automatic. This is easily determined  from the cartridges. Revolver cartridges have a rim that's larger than the case body - that stops the cartridge from moving too far into the cylinder chamber. Automatic cartridges, on the other hand, have a rim the *same size* as the case.

There are two revolver cartridges shown here - can you spot them among the automatic cartridges?

The differences to an experienced police officer are obvious and can VERY QUICKLY be determined... but this caused a problem because Oswald didn't carry an automatic.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-40-Refuted

Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission #2

"On Friday, November 1, Oswald did cash a Texas Unemployment Commission check for $33 at another supermarket in Irving..." (WCR 331)

"Mrs. Tarrants stated as best as she recalls, on Thursday night, October 31, 1963  LEE HARVEY OSWALD appeared at the cashier's cage and presented the above check to her and requested that it be cashed." (CE 1165 pg 6)


Notice that yet again, the actual TESTIMONY is in conflict with what the Warren Commission said it was... The Warren Commission had no evidence for Oswald cashing a check on Friday, rather than Thursday - but this wouldn't have fit the evolving storyline. The WC clearly didn't want to provide proof that a Thursday visit to Irving was not unique - for their theory needed a unique visit on a Thursday to pick up a rifle. They simply lied in order to do so.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Provable-Lies-Of-The-Warren-Commission-2

It's Truly Amusing How Easy It Is...

To run off believers... 

All you have to do is keep citing & quoting the evidence... and believers just get frustrated and leave. 

The list of believers who've run from me is long... although mostly trolls, it also includes believers well versed in the evidence, such as John McAdams, Henry Sienzant, Patrick Collins, David Von Pein and others... 

Believers simply cannot explain the evidence in terms of their faith - and get irritated every time I point it out. 

The evidence is WELL EXPLAINED in terms of a conspiracy - yet doesn't fit the Warren Commission's theory at all. 

Which explains why the Warren Commission simply lied about the evidence they collected. 

And despite my posting of the "Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission" for many years now - there's *STILL* no answers to them. 

Our most recent believer was posting anonymously as "Hollywood" - although he admitted to being the anonymous "Dale" of the Amazon Forums. Unfortunately, due to childish behavior, Hollywood has been placed in a moderation queue - where any future posts he makes will be censored for his frequent ad hominem attacks.

But my crystal ball tells me that like the previous list of believers, "Hollywood" too will disappear...

The evidence simply isn't in their favor.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-It-s-Truly-Amusing-How-Easy-It-Is

Clinton's Impeachment... Modern Schooling.

It's truly funny just how many people have never learned the most basic facts about America.

Here's the silly statement quoted:

Anthony Marsh Wrote:They already tried to impeach Bill Clinton and failed.

You can find the original thread here.

Now, I hope that no readers in this forum would make such a monumentally stupid assertion. Former President Clinton was impeached - that's merely historical fact. He was not convicted - that's also a fact.

And, like all believers in the Warren Commission, Anthony Marsh has thus far refused to correct his statement, even doubling down on it in the same forum - asserting that: "They tried, [to impeach] but they didn't have enough votes."

Of course, this is the same person who claimed that Dr. Humes burned paperwork in his fireplace on Saturday, then denied he'd said that.

So Anthony isn't an honest person... but clearly - neither is he an educated one.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Clinton-s-Impeachment-Modern-Schooling

Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission #1

Speculation. - Tippit and his killer knew each other.
Commission finding. - Investigation has revealed no evidence that Oswald and Tippit were acquainted, had ever seen each other, or had any mutual acquaintances. (WCR  651)

"...recalled the person now recognized as Oswald was last seen by her in the restaurant at about 10 a.m. Wednesday, November 20, at which time he was "nasty" and used curse words in connection with his order. She went on to relate that Officer J.D. Tippit was in the restaurant, as was his habit at about that time each morning, and "shot a glance at Oswald." She said there was no indication, however, that they knew each other. (CE 3001)

The WCR lied when stating that there was no evidence that Oswald and Tippit had ever seen each other.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Provable-Lies-Of-The-Warren-Commission-1

Vincent Bugliosi Was A Liar...

"I can assure the conspiracy theorists who have very effectively savaged Posner in their books that they're going to have a much, much more difficult time with me. As a trial lawyer in front of a jury and an author of true-crime books, credibility has always meant everything to me. My only master and my only mistress are the facts and objectivity. I have no others. The theorists may not agree with my conclusions, but in this work on the assassination I intend to set forth all of their main arguments, and the way they, not I, want them to be set forth, before I seek to demonstrate their invalidity. I will not knowingly omit or distort anything. However, with literally millions of pages of documents on this case, there are undoubtedly references in some of them that conspiracy theorists feel are supportive of a particular point of theirs, but that I simply never came across." - Vincent Bugliosi

"Although Carrico was unable to determine whether the throat wound was an entrance or exit wound, he did observe that the wound was "ragged," virtually a sure sign of an exit wound as opposed to an entrance wound, which is usually round and devoid of ragged edges." - Reclaiming History, pg 413

"Dr. CARRICO - Yes. And this wound was fairly round, had no jagged edges, no evidence of powder burns, and so forth." WC Testimony.

Vincent Bugliosi was a liar.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-Was-A-Liar

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #39 Refuted.

(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with being fired from Oswald's .38.

This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.

But it really makes no sense at all.

The Warren Commission even went to the trouble of 'expert witness shopping' - since their FBI ballistic experts declined to match any Tippit bullets to the alleged Oswald pistol. They found Joseph Nicol willing to match one of the bullets... however, as Dale Myers (no friend of critics) has written:
 

Dale Myers Wrote:One ballistic expert, Joseph D. Nicol, did find "sufficient individual characteristics" on one of the four bullets to reach the conclusion that it had been fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons. However, none of the eight ballistic experts who have examined the bullets agree with Nicol's positive identification.

You won't find Vincent Bugliosi telling you this...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-39-Refuted

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #38 Refuted.

(38) Oswald was the sole owner of the revolver found in his possession on arrest.

It's possible... I find the evidence that Oswald owned a pistol far stronger and more credible than that for the Mannlicher Carcano. But owning a pistol that wasn't used to shoot JFK and could not be ballistically matched by the FBI for the Tippit murder is just as credible evidence against Oswald as the thousands of other people in Dallas that day who owned a pistol.

Indeed, the police arresting Oswald all had pistols. The mere possession of a legally owned firearm has never been 'proof' that someone committed a crime.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-38-Refuted

George HW Bush

A question occurs to me which clearly occurs to *no* believers...why can't George HW Bush remember where he was during a moment in history that even 5-year-olds can recall with perfect clarity?

In fact, I think the entire Bush clan has plead amnesia on this case.

As I patiently wait for this ghoul to die, I wonder how much spoliation of evidence occured during Bush Sr's tenure as CIA director, and how that will affect October's disclosure of documents.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-George-HW-Bush

Christopher Hitchens Pontificates On The JFK Assassination

"When will you know that the official story is false, as the Warren Commission is... and as Warren admitted in private, he'd been asked to keep public opinion re-assured." - Christopher Hitchens

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYmyMJ0H6DQ


Jump to around 28:30

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Christopher-Hitchens-Pontificates-On-The-JFK-Assassination

Essay and report writing skills

Most academic publications would require you to write down assignments or reports, and this loose OpenLearn direction, Essay and record writing talents, is designed to help you to expand the competencies you need to put in writing effectively for educational purposes. It includes clear education and a number activities that will help you to recognize what's required, and to devise, shape and write your assignment writing service or reviews. You will also find out the way to use comments to increase your skills.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Essay-and-report-writing-skills

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #37 Refuted.

(37) Oswald's prints were found on boxes that comprised the sniper's nest.

They would be *EXPECTED* to be there... he worked there. What should *NOT* be there are prints from an *UNKNOWN* person who didn't work there - and were never identified. Far from being evidence against Oswald, the fingerprint evidence instead shows that leads weren't followed up by the DPD & FBI. And although Bugliosi had nothing to do with it – this particular topic – the relative paucity of fingerprints on these boxes, led one Warren Commission Believer (Patrick Collins) to hypothesize that Oswald was moving the boxes with his forearms.

Yes, you read that right! His forearms. It truly takes a Believer to come up with these explanations...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-37-Refuted

David Von Pein Lies About Guinn.

David Von Pein Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:You can keep right on trying to compare the paraffin test with the NAA test...and you'll *KNOW* that you're lying. Apparently it doesn't matter at all to you. 

I wasn't comparing the paraffin tests to the NAA tests, Holmes. I just took notice of that interesting "7 out of 8 were NEGATIVE" stat regarding the paraffin/nitrate tests that Dr. Guinn performed, and so I just threw that in as a "bonus" for you to chew on (and spit out). 

Of course, David is lying, and he KNOWS he's lying... because he's quoted the full text on his site. 

He continues to evade the fact that the NAA tests were all positive, WHEN DONE ON THE SAME CASTS THAT WERE NEGATIVE IN THE PARAFFIN TEST. 

Guinn wasn't supporting the Warren Commission's false & misleading test, HE WAS POINTING OUT WHY IT WAS A BAD TEST! 

Here's the full quote: 

Pat Speers Website Wrote:On 8-31 the Dallas Morning News runs their own article on Guinn's statements in Scotland about the use of NAA, entitled "New Test May Tell if Oswald Shot a Gun." The FBI's Special Agent in Charge for Dallas, J. Gordon Shanklin, who'd previously told the New York Times that the paraffin tests performed in Dallas proved Oswald's guilt, calls Laboratory Director Conrad and warns him about the article, written by Hugh Aynesworth. Beyond the statements by Guinn already cited, Aynesworth relates that Guinn "said when it was concluded that Oswald's guilt could not be proved or disproved from paraffin tests made by the Dallas Police, he asked the FBI to try the neutron activation analysis technique. Guinn described the experiment in this manner: A rifle similar to the one that killed the president was used. One person fired the rifle on eight different occasions and each time was given the paraffin test. 'Only one out of the eight experiments gave a positive identification,' Guinn said. Then they repeated the experiment using radioactivity. 'It was positive in all eight  cases, and showed a primer on both hands and cheeks,' he said. 'Then we took the casts of Oswald's cheek and put them in a nuclear reactor.  Remember that they already had been through the chemical tests which would wash particles away. I can say for the moment that we found no barium but we found antimony in every case,' Guinn added." 

Now, any intelligent and HONEST person will realize that Guinn was pointing out that the paraffin test will often give a false negative, while the NAA test was accurate each time. Here's how David summarized the above statement on his website: 

David Von Peins Website Wrote:"A rifle similar to the one that killed the president was used. One person fired the rifle on eight different occasions and each time was given the paraffin test. 'Only one out of the eight experiments gave a positive identification,' Guinn said." 

Therefore, after performing EIGHT separate standard paraffin (nitrate) tests on a person who definitely HAD fired a rifle similar to Lee Harvey Oswald's Carcano rifle, SEVEN of the eight tests revealed just exactly the same thing that the FBI's 1964 test revealed after FBI agent Charles Killion had fired Oswald's rifle three times --- a negative result for the presence of any nitrates. 

So much for the FBI/Killion test being a big fat lie (which is what some conspiracy theorists have told me they think that FBI test was---a lie). 

Or do CTers also think Dr. Guinn lied SEVEN times too about the nitrate/paraffin tests he says he performed? 

Notice that David simply lied. The FBI/Killion test WAS INDEED A LIE... one that Guinn POINTED OUT in the full text that David doesn't understand. (and that would be a kind way of putting it!) 

Now, David can't answer this - the only possible answer would be "I read it too fast, and didn't understand it" 

But even that answer fails to the point that I labeled this claim of his about Guinn's tests as an outright lie, and he failed to defend his lie. 
 

HE KNOWS HE GOT CAUGHT LYING AGAIN!! 

And an honest man would admit it, and remove that material from his website, AND STOP LYING ABOUT GUINN'S TESTS... But David Von Pein isn't an honest man. 

And his website will NEVER be corrected - because it's not truth that David is after. 

(This post was originally posted on alt.conspiracy.jfk, and as of the time of this posting, has not been answered by David Von Pein - although he's read it.)

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-David-Von-Pein-Lies-About-Guinn

David Von Pein Asks A Simple Question...

David Von Pein Wrote:How did the Klein's "Pay To The Order" stamp get on the back of the Hidell money order if that money order was never handled by anyone at Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago? 

It didn't NEED to be handled by anyone at Klein's. 

It WAS PROVABLY handled by the FBI. 

The same FBI that sent three agents to Klein's on the evening of 11/22/63. This was roughly 24 hours BEFORE the money order was allegedly found. 

Do I have to explain this in any more detail? 

Can David Von Pein actually ask a question that cannot be answered CREDIBLY by a knowledgeable critic? 

Can David Von Pein PUBLICLY ADMIT that there's an easy, credible answer to his challenge?

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-David-Von-Pein-Asks-A-Simple-Question

It's Easy To Do... Just FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE!

Boz Wrote:Research- studious inquiry or examination; especially :  investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or laws in the light of new facts, or practical application of such new or revised theories or laws 

How can someone be a researcher when he comes to the conclusion that there were 5 shots fired at JFK?

Anyone who bothers to read the testimony knows that doctors stated Connally ALONE could have been hit by up to three separate bullets. Add a minimum of two bullets for JFK - and even my simplistic math skills manage to make it to five. I don't see a problem here...

The real question is: How can someone be a researcher and not know the testimony?

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-It-s-Easy-To-Do-Just-FOLLOW-THE-EVIDENCE

Historical Fact? NOT!!!

Boz Wrote:It is an historical fact that Oswald shot and killed Kennedy.  It is a waste of time debating a fact. It's like debating whether 2 plus 1 equals three. 

This amusing admission was posted on John McAdam's censored forum.

Believers simply cannot debate the "facts" in this case - the evidence doesn't support their "facts".

So they simply assert that it's a "waste of time" - when in fact, it has nothing to do with wasting time, it has to do with the fact that believers CANNOT defend the Warren Commission without ad hominem and outright lying.

Such as Patrick Collins repeated assertion that the majority of witnesses documented IN PRINT in the first two days pointed, not to the Grassy Knoll, but to the TSBD.

Yet he continues to refuse to cite for that "fact"... what does that tell the intelligent lurker?

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Historical-Fact-NOT

NOT ONE EYEWITNESS!!!

No matter how many times I bring this up, believers run for the hills every single time - and absolutely REFUSE to answer.

Name even a SINGLE eyewitness whom you believe completely in their 1963-1964 statements about what they saw and heard.

Still unanswered.

This demonstrates beyond any possible refutation that believers have faith, not evidence...

For while there are provable liars among the eyewitnesses, *MOST* of the witnesses in this case are quite credible indeed.

Unfortunately for believers, their testimony simply doesn't support the Warren Commission's case - which is why the Warren Commission simply lied about some of that testimony.

And no explanation for this fact has ever been forthcoming from believers...

What AMAZING cowardice!

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-NOT-ONE-EYEWITNESS

Another Vincent Bugliosi Lie...

Vincent Bugliosi Wrote:The single most important discovery, and one that establishes with 
absolute and irrefutable certainty that the autopsy photographs have not 
been altered, is the fact that many of the photographs, when combined in 
pairs, produce stereoscopic images.

On what PERSONAL basis can Bugliosi assert this? 

Of course, those who don't accept the Warren Commission's theory have refuted this... in particular, the BOH photo which they've seen in stereo, and deny this claim of Bugliosi's... 

The BOH photos DO NOT present a three dimensional view...

There's a reason why the autopsy photos still haven't been released to the public.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Another-Vincent-Bugliosi-Lie

Proof that the SBT is Sheer Nonsense.

Dr. Gregory worked on Connally's wrist, and gave five reasons that the bullet that went through Connally's wrist did so from the outside to the palm side.

1. The general ragged appearance of the dorsal wound is typical of an entrance wound.

2. Bits of thread and cloth were carried into the wound on the dorsal side and these corresponded with a tear in the jacket sleeve.

3. Two or three fragments were shed after the bullet had hit the radius. The three fragments taken from the wrist were more volar and caused by the radius flaking them off.

4. The distortion of the soft tissues shows the pathway to be dorsal to volar.

5. Air in the wound is more visible on the dorsal side of the X-ray which is typical of entrance wound.

It's not a surprise that believers absolutely REFUSE to debate this issue, or to explain it away...

But it demonstrates that the SBT is just a bunch of hooey...

(Watch as believers assert that they can't understand this, or simply refuse to answer...)

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Proof-that-the-SBT-is-Sheer-Nonsense

Teaching Children Religion...

In a post apparently arguing against parents teaching their children religion, this statement was made:

Bud Wrote:Another thing, scaring children with unsupportable tales of eternal punishment is child abuse.

Unfortunately for atheists, the strongest evidence today for the fact of a theistic universe is science itself.

But even if it could be proven beyond all doubt that there is no God - the teaching of religious values is still in society's best interests - those raised in religious homes are far less likely to rob you, or murder you. Teaching values is the major task facing parents... when character is taught, then society benefits.

Atheism doesn't teach moral values - that can only come from God.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Teaching-Children-Religion

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #36 Refuted.

(36) A handmade paper bag large enough to carry Oswald's rifle was found in the sniper's nest.

No photograph exists of the paper bag in situ. Ironically, if you *look* at the paper bag, it's quite clear that it was originally simply folded around a book... this was, after all the Texas School BOOK Depository... 



Here's another view of the bag - again note the folding:


And, as has been pointed out, when a Mannlicher Carcano has been broken down (AS WOULD HAVE BEEN NECESSARY), and placed in a bag - "the first seven or eight inches of the [wooden] stock show obvious signs of severe scoring and scratching. This is caused by the protruding parts of the barrel assembly - principally the trigger - rubbing against it as the bag is moved or carried."

As Ian Griggs continues to point out, "So what is the significance of these facts? Quite simply, no such scratches have ever been reported on the CE 139 rifle. Furthermore, they are not evident in any photographs taken of that rifle. To me, this provides irrefutable physical proof that the rifle was never transported in a disassembled state in a long paper bag as has been claimed by the investigative agencies and the Warren Commission." - No Case to Answer, Ian Griggs - page 200.

And, even if we accept, for the purpose of argument, that a paper bag was found – it fails to support any guilt on Oswald's part – the paper bag he was carrying was too short to carry the rifle. Observations that were corroborated by the nature of the observation – that the bag was carried in the palm of the hand, and tucked under Oswald's armpit. Simply impossible were it a rifle in the bag.

Indeed, the fact that a paper bag was found in the mail, addressed to Oswald at a non-existent Dallas address, with metered postage (not stamps), yet short by 12 cents. Then, on Nov 23, a postage due card for 12 cents arrives at Ruth Paine's house – despite this not being the non-existent address found on the package to Oswald. This just absolutely SCREAMS frame-up... and Warren Commission believers have to just scratch their head... no explanation in sight.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-36-Refuted

Example of Poor Logic...

Bud Wrote:The fact is that most of the people who have appointed themselves to look into this matter display precious little skill in doing so. It is a simple thing to determine that Oswald killed Kennedy, it is a conclusion that is both obvious and on firm ground. When someone not only can't determine that Oswald killed Kennedy, but spends all their time concocting ways to try to undermine that firm ground it becomes apparent very quickly that they are only playing silly games. 

This is the sort of nonsensical claptrap that defines Warren Commission believers nowadays. Just for the sheer enjoyment, I'll take it apart:

"The fact is that most of the people who have appointed themselves to look into this matter display precious little skill in doing so."

As, of course, you're demonstrating. No citations, no examples, no evidence - merely speculative opinion based on nothing whatsoever.

"It is a simple thing to determine that Oswald killed Kennedy, it is a conclusion that is both obvious and on firm ground."

If it actually were a simple thing - then believers wouldn't be so deathly afraid of knowledgeable critics. For example, right here in this forum I've been taking apart Vincent Bugliosi's best evidence for the Warren Commission's theory - and there aren't any believers around to defend Bugliosi.

Not because they simply don't care - they cannot defend Bugliosi because his assertions are simply indefensible. So where's this "firm ground" that "Bud" asserts - yet can't demonstrate? Why is it that believers such as "Bud" are constantly making claims that they cannot support?

It's no surprise that I'm constantly labeling believers as dishonest and cowardly - they keep proving this on a daily basis. While I can answer, and CREDIBLY so, any question posed on the evidence by a believer - the opposite simply isn't true. Even when they promise to answer (as Patrick Collins did) - they end up running away.

"When someone not only can't determine that Oswald killed Kennedy, but spends all their time concocting ways to try to undermine that firm ground it becomes apparent very quickly that they are only playing silly games."

What "Bud" fails to acknowledge, is that there's no particular reason on the part of critics to label Oswald innocent. It would matter NOT AT ALL to hold that he's guilty as sin, and pulled the trigger. If he pulled the trigger while others were also pulling their triggers - IT'S STILL A CONSPIRACY.

So why do so many critics defend Oswald?

It's not the critics doing so... it's the EVIDENCE that shows him to be innocent. It's the EVIDENCE that shows he was framed.

If this were such a simple case as "Bud" implies, then there's no reason for the classification of so much of the evidence... take, for example; the medical testimony that was classified by the HSCA - "Bud" can't supply any possible and credible non-conspiratorial reason for its classification.

He will ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to offer any reason, since he's well aware that anything he might offer will be quickly shown to be nothing but nonsense.

So in addition to being an example of poor logic, "Bud's" statement shows him to be a coward as well - since he'll absolutely refuse to defend it.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Example-of-Poor-Logic

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #35 Refuted.

(35) The three expended shells on the sixth floor were "fired in and ejected from" Oswald's rifle.

This is simply not true. As Thompson pointed out long ago, and anyone can eyeball for themselves, CE543 doesn't have the characteristic 'chamber mark' that all other cartridges known to have been fired from CE2766 had.

You can view CE543 on the left here:


For anyone interested, you can also locate online photos of shells fired from the Mannlicher Carcano by the FBI after the assassination - which also have the same 'chamber mark'.

Note again the dead silence coming from Warren Commission believers - who don't have any way to refute my refutation of Bugliosi's "evidence".

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-35-Refuted

All Believers Are Dishonest... (Mark Ulrik Example)

Mark Ulrik Wrote:Wow, Ben finally banned me! He and his pals are probably having a small victory dance right now. Although I had requested an opportunity to delete the profile myself, it was kind of a relief. All the childish insults, hypocrisy, Bizarro World logic, etc., were beginning to get to me. 

Although Mark admits to requesting that his profile be deleted - he then asserts that I "banned" him when I simply did as he requested.

Mark, as any other believer - is certainly welcome to post here. But it seems that all the believers have run away. They can't survive in a forum that doesn't allow ad hominem attacks.

It would be truly amusing if I could find an honest and knowledgeable believer - but so far, I never have.

Can anyone point me to such a critter?

Does any knowledgeable and honest person exist, that believes the Warren Commission? Anywhere?

(Of course, much like my question concerning any eyewitness whom believers accept, this question too will never be answered...)

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-All-Believers-Are-Dishonest-Mark-Ulrik-Example

Anthony Marsh Is A Liar...

Anthony Marsh Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:As an example: In another forum, the claim was made that the Mannlicher Carcano could be recycled in 1.6 seconds... this is in conflict with the known evidence, and is an example of a lie. Anyone making that claim would merely be quoted, then the citation to the FBI testing of CE-139 showing the actual cycling time - then, and only then, may the offending poster be labeled a liar.

That is not true. That is a lie. 

The known evidence does not rule out 1.6 seconds. People have done it. 

It has NEVER been done. Tony will be completely unable to cite any such demonstration of CE-139 cycling that fast.

Tony is a cowardly liar...

Quite despicable of him to label me a liar when I'm telling the truth, and HE'S lying...

I challenge him to tell the truth.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Anthony-Marsh-Is-A-Liar

All The Eyewitnesses Were Lying...

Dave Reitzes Wrote:JFK researchers sometimes allude to the Randall Dale Adams case publicized in Errol Morris' documentary, THE THIN BLUE LINE, as an example of Dallas injustice. (In fairness to the Dallas authorities, the tendency of police officers or prosecutors to rush to judgment or rely on poor evidence is hardly exclusive to Dallas.) 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thin_B...1988_film) 

Something that particularly strikes me in the film is the interview with Adams prosecution witness Emily Miller, who comes across as an almost too perfect example of the sort of over-imaginative, over-eager busybody who likes to inject oneself into a criminal case -- talking about how she always wanted to be a detective, how murders seemed to happen around her all the time, and how she loves to solve crimes before the police do. Her testimony against Adams was a crucial factor in Adams' murder conviction, and it was later discredited. (An acquaintance tried to tell the authorities what a liar Miller was, and was ignored.) 

Most eyewitnesses are sincere and sober enough (regardless of how accurate their perceptions and memories may be), but these kinds of attention seekers really do exist, and, as James Phelan noted, high profile cases bring them forth in droves. When people allude to such bogus witnesses as Beverly Oliver, Gordon Arnold, Rose Cherami, Nancy Perrin Rich, Jack S. Martin, Richard Case Nagell, et al, and ask "Could all these people be lying?" -- the answer is YES. 

I have, on more occasions than I can count, challenged believers to name even a single witness they believe entirely in their 1963-1964 statements & testimony.

Nothing but dead silence... and I predict, that there will continue to be dead silence in any forum that cannot control my responses...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-All-The-Eyewitnesses-Were-Lying

FBI Involvement In The Conspiracy...

David Emerling Wrote:

Anonymous Believer Wrote:... Custer's bullshit story about a bullet falling out of JFK's back ...

Plus, there were two FBI agents in attendance at the autopsy. One of their primary responsibilities was to gather any evidence - in particular, A BULLET! It's hard to imagine that Agents Sibert and O'Neill wouldn't be interested in a bullet that fell to the floor. 

But, of course, this is where the CTs claim that the FBI was in on the conspiracy. There really is no winning this argument. The more proof you give, the larger the conspiracy becomes. They never once pause to consider how absolutely unwieldy (and implausible) their conspiracy has become. And yet, they will never articulate the specific nature of this "conspiracy". All they do is stand on the rooftops and yell "Conspiracy!" - then they call that research.

No matter how many times it's pointed out, believers run away... there were quite conceivably less than a dozen people in the actual conspiracy.

And, it's been articulated many times. Entire books have been written on the topic.

The only truth to be found is that believers are cowards... they are afraid to debate knowledgeable critics.

And that truth is demonstrated daily as believers refuse to debate.

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-FBI-Involvement-In-The-Conspiracy

Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #34 Refuted.

(34) The mostly intact bullet (CE 399) and two of the fragments (CE567 and CE569) were fired from this rifle.

I would expect that whichever rifle was used, would be tied to the Patsy. The chain of custody on all these bullets & fragments is shaky indeed... CE399 probably would not have survived any decent defense attorney's challenges to it.

This also presumes two "facts" not in evidence … that the Mannlicher Carcano belonged to Oswald, and that it was him who was firing it.

Once again, be sure to note the dead silence coming from believers...

Bugliosi simply cannot be defended from reasonable refutation...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-34-Refuted

Politics & the Assassination - Dishonest Critics.

Ramon F. Herrera Wrote:There are 4 clearly aligned positions in the case of JFK's murder.

Each group has a well defined motivation.

(1) Liberal Conspiracy Theorists

This group is still grieving by the horrible crime. They feel robbed of a demigod who reached mythic proportions. Their source of frustration is the breach of the trust between the government and The People, an injustice that has been unresolved for too long.

Oliver Stone, John Kerry (best friend of Teddy), all the Kennedys, Obama, Clintons, Gore, Jim DiEugenio, Jeff Morley, Gary Aguilar, Cyril Wecht, Ramon F. Herrera.


(2) Liberal Lone Nutters

These folks are terrified about the real possibility that LBJ had something to do with it:

Chris Mathews, Jimmy Carter, Larry Sabato, Robert Allbritton, who is the Founder of Politico and Member of the Trustees of the LBJ Library, Jean Davison, etc.

I am convinced that Rachel Maddow is a closeted CT (she is too intelligent to be LN) but must follow MSNBC policy.

The position of the right is more interesting. Per their nature, it is rooted on abhorrence. It hinges on what they despise the most. See groups No. 3 and No. 4 below.


Conservative/Republicans:

(3) Conservative Lone Nutters:

They hate the Democratic Party the most. Schadenfreude is a factor:

"It was a freakin' commie!! One of your own!!! Oswald did it to impress Fidel!!"

Prof. John McAdams, Bill O'Reilly, Donald Trump, Steve Logan and most Conservatives


(4) Conservative Conspiracy Theorists

These folks have never met a conspiracy they didn't like. First and foremost, they hate the US government with a blind fury.

.See Birthers, Truthers, InfoWars, Breitbart, etc.

Note: We can include CT Libertarians in Group No. 4. See the reason below:

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/polit...rnment.png

Well, it's not hard to place Ramon in the political spectrum... he's clearly a lefty.

I challenge him to correctly place me in his list...

It can't be done. I'm to the right of Rush Limbaugh, and laugh at the Moon Landing, 9/11, Birthers, and other wacky conspiracy theories.

Polls would suggest that there are a lot of people similar to me - yet Ramon can't put us into a category.

Clearly, dishonesty isn't limited to the believer's side of the aisle...

from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Politics-the-Assassination-Dishonest-Critics