Patrick C Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:If Bugliosi spent over 20 years studying the evidence, yet was unaware of one of the most critical and devastating facts that tends to show a conspiracy, how can he be trusted for anything he says about the case?
I think that is a very subjective view.
I listed two facts.
#1 - Bugliosi spent over 20 years studying the evidence.
#2 - Bugliosi failed to understand a very basic bit of medical evidence.
Which one was "subjective," Patrick?
I stated that "I predict that NO believer will specifically address this question." - looks like I was perfectly correct.
And despite asking Patrick what was "subjective" - he has avoided this question for years...
from Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-Subjectivity-And-Patrick-Collins
No comments:
Post a Comment