Patrick C wrote:
Patrick C wrote:An opinion that isn't very credible, judging by your previous proven lying on the topic of this case.
Once again you call me I liar. This is getting to become a daily accusation and ill founded. It is thuggish, rather ignorant behaviour on your part Holmes. Not really my cup of tea - and that is being polite.
So I think for the time being at least, enjoy your forum and enjoy the self indulgent back patting with your fellow crackpots. I might check in once in a while for a laugh and I might make a post with the other guys.... But anyway I expect the number of posts will now deservedly drop somewhat!
Not unexpected...
Most WCR Supporters will never enter this forum. John McAdams, for example; learned long ago that he cannot debate me in a forum he doesn't control. David Von Pein has made it clear he'll never post here... I'm sure Henry has dropped in, but knows better than to try to debate in a forum where there's no personal attacks allowed.
This is a frequent tactic of WCR Supporters... when the going gets rough, they simply disappear.
Quite frankly, I think they're doing the only possible thing they can do... and I don't blame 'em at all...
But if the evidence were in their favor, this wouldn't be a useful tactic.
All you're doing, Patrick; is proving that there's no honest way to defend the Warren Commission's theory - using the EVIDENCE in this case...
And I'm happy with that.
Statistics: Posted by Ben Holmes — Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:59 pm
from ConspiracyJFKForum.com http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=102&p=958#p958
No comments:
Post a Comment