Mark Ulrik wrote:
If I told you what you could do with your straw men and red herrings, I'd be censored, so I won't. The question is poorly phrased, btw, as "lossy" relates to loss of information, not loss of pixels per se. And it's still breathtakingly dishonest of you to pretend that my arguments depend on pixel perfection. My images are more than accurate enough to bring my points across. What would you say if I demanded atomic clock precision from you? Give me Chaney's exact coordinates, or you lose.
Once again, you run from the question.
It would seem that you're willing to be honest about the lossy format of JPEG compression, yet unwilling to admit the logical fact that is drawn from that...
Statistics: Posted by Ben Holmes — Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:49 pm
from ConspiracyJFKForum.com http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=95&p=983#p983
No comments:
Post a Comment