Patrick C wrote:
Neither the Z film nor Altgens photos are altered Ben.
The idea that they are is within the domain of crackpot theories on this case.
IMO, the case I made is strong. That you think differently, merely highlights your lack of scientific method. I bet you NEVER once considered measuring the DPD helmets - it never occurred to you ....
Patrick C wrote:
Neither the Z film nor Altgens photos are altered Ben.
Here's you problem with this line of reaction Patrick, first we assume you're .john's and Mel Ayton's loon nut spokeperson here. Second you're an ardent defender of the 1964 WCR and its lies with noting else other than the devil told you to believe. You've shown no cause for anyone here or otherwise to believe you other than fractured and hard to believe opinion. You have not authenticated the alleged original, in-camera Zapruder film currently housed at NARA today. Why?
The film and photo evidence related to this case is in horrible shape. The best loon nuts can come up with is simple:
"Neither the Z film nor Altgens photos are altered Ben. The idea that they are is within the domain of crackpot theories on this case." Sounds familia Patrick? Sounds loon nut desperate to me, Patrick.
Statistics: Posted by David Healy — Fri Jul 15, 2016 11:13 pm
from ConspiracyJFKForum.com http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=95&p=742#p742
No comments:
Post a Comment